Better victories: Pac over Morales and Barrera or Floyd over Chico and Castillo

Again your full of ****. Find me this bunch of under 19yr olds that became lineal champs? Pac was a kid beating up on grown men...that's how great he is. The guy has been a champ since 19, more than a decade later he still considered prime yet MAB who was p4p #3 and 29 was past it? lol. Clown. Yes he was weight weakened, evident by him jumping over 2 weight classes, whats your point?

 

this thread must be some cruel joke

The Barrera win by itself is greater Castillo + Chico

 

Morales and Barrera are HOF top fighters and Castillo and Corrales were not. Marquez is more the level of Castillo and Corrales.

 

Castillo who? Chico who?






Not related:

This content is protected

 

JMM is a sure hall of famer

Castillo and corrales are borderline hall of famers

 

Marquez lost to Chris John. overrated. Barrera and Morales greats. Castillo and Corrales borderline? I would hope not. I think guys have to have a better win record than that to be in the hall of fame.

 

Pac's win over Barrera and Morales. Not only were they the better fighters over Chico and JLC, but Pac was moving up when he beat those 2. Floyd only had to move up in the JLC fight.

Lopsided Poll.

 

Find you a bunch of 19 year olds lolnut:nut. So what he was 19 when he won a title. How old was he when he got knocked out twice? Barrera fought like a man who didn't want to be in the ring. Barrera fought back, and loved it when guys attacked him in his prime. Barrera was sick as an aggressor and counter puncher. I saw none of that from Barrera in the Pac fight.

Barrera's bad performance came partly from Pac, but it was more of what Barrera wasn't able to do. Barrera started fighting at 15 so age 29 for him is ring old. When I see a man who used to pull the trigger holster his gun, something is up. You didn't see this because you love Pac so much. Pac jumping two weight classes was not evident of anything when Pac lost because he lost the fight before he moved up lol:nut..what a dumb comment from you also. So PAc being weight weakened is an excuse...right???:nut

 

100 more votes :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

You didnt see **** because Pac hit too fast, and hit too hard. Where was this great performance against JJ? JJ didnt allow it and Pac is 10& the fighter JJ is.

MAB started fighting at 15 :|, Pac started fighting at 16, champ by 19 and now aged 30 still considered prime.

You and your BS, I can smell it through my screen.

Stick to pretneding your some kind of world champ, champ

 

Danger, I was loving these weak arguments from you, but the above post...I swear I do not see any points in your sorry ass thoughts lol...I swear! The underlined...is utterly ridiculous lol... Also, stop trying to spell words that you aren't sure how to spell.

 

:happy pac was a lineal champ in a division that is not his natural weight:happy

 

When Pac fought MAB, Pac was nobody!!! Nuff said!!!

 

Oh dear, at least I have an argument, you dont even have one.

This isn't a spelling contest, my spelling is fine. Its typo's and if thats your argument...that's beyond weak.

God you must be a full time clown.

 

I'd go for Pacquiao as his victories were againt two all time greats. Although Barrera and Morrales where past there primes they were still tough fights.