Better victories: Pac over Morales and Barrera or Floyd over Chico and Castillo

You were lucky to make it out of the first round brother. The bell couldn't have come soon enough, you were out on your feet and calling for your mother.

 

Pac came up from 122 to 126, his first fight at that weight he beats the RIng & Lineal champ and p4p#3 MAB who was ocming off wins from hamed, Morales, Ayala, Peden Tapia & kelley, After that he came back to beat Morales, Fana & Juarez and came back top to 5 p4p. MAB who is a genuine ATG, Corrales who would be lucky to get into HOF. Corrales was more green than MAB was past it.

Pac-MAB>>>>>>>>>Floyd-Corrales.

Seeing as how the first Castillo fight was very controversial, your better off comparing that win to Pac's controversial win over JMM. If you wanna compare their second wins however, Pac KO a guy who has never been Ko'd before, a guy who was top 10 p4p and has beaten him 10months prior. People play the Raheem card, first off the fight was held at LW and Morales still came in overweight. When a fighter comes in overweight for a fight thats 5lbs higher, you know he hasnt taken it too seriously. Second, Raheem was a stylistic nightmare a very akward one at that, a slickster that would have given Morales trouble. People say DLH looked **** on the night despite his record previous to the Pac fight, well Morales looked great against Pac on the night, despite his previous loss to Raheem at LW.

A Morales who was good enough to beat Pac 10months prior, never been KO'd and then be KO'd in that fashion IMO is a very impressive victory. Morales in terms of ATG sense >>> castillo.

Because of what Castillo went on to do after the fight that gets extra bonus points.

Castillo>Morales


Overall though, those 2 Pac wins a much better, simply because of the MAB win and its arguable that Morales win was greater than the Castillo win.

 

Any other year and this would have been FOTY no question. :good

 

and it would not change the poll results made by the Thread starter!

 

I'd go with JMM two schoolings over Pac.

 

Yup! JMM was given two chances over pac. He bothed failed to get a W!
but was succesful in his ass NOT kissing the canvas 5x's. Only four times!

but props to JMM for fighting PBF!


Win or loss he got my respect!

 

Oh they have a reason..Hatered, its the best reason for anything.

Some of the same people change thier points of view when it somes to other fights..IE Hatton was much better at 140 when fighting Pac then he was fighting Floyd at 147..Lets not mention that he was knocked the **** out for the first time in his career, and after that he was hurt by a non-punching Lazcano, it was clearly a better win for Pac..Its like saying that Taver's knockout win over Jones had nothing to do with him losing to Johnson. They talk about Floyd fighting JMM or Pac at 147 is putting them at a disadvantage as if fighting Oscar at 145 a weight that he could make 10 ****ing years ago wasnt a disadvantage.

What Im sayin is short is there is no doubt a double standard. Its in no way more impressive beatting too past thier primes former greats over to young in thier primes fighters. Albeit they werent the fighters prime for prime but Pac didnt fight those fighters in thier primes, and if he had judging from the fact that he lost to Erik the first time I would venture to guess that he would have lost to both in thier primes:good

 

I agree it was the first LOSS of Hatton but it was the first time also fought out of his 140lbs TURF. They fought at the TURF of PBF which was at 147lbs.. Obviously if was the comfort zone of PBF.

PAC fought HATTON on his own comfort zone which was at 140lbs. Rmember HATTON never lost at 140lbs and Hatton had to carry additional weight in order to fight PBF.

pbf took 10 ROUNDS to beat HATTON on PBF's comfort zone of 147lbs. Dude, it took PAC two rounds to beat HATTON on his OWN comfort zone at 140lbs.


You say, the voters were pbf haters?! Some say the voters were pac fans?! All the excuses in the world will come out just to insinuate NAAH! The poll is fraud! :hi:

 

IF PBF won the poll. YOu would say PBF had a better win !
IF PAC won the poll. You called it Hatered?! Hatred?! :huhatsch

 

If PBF won the polls it's called legitimate
If PAC won the polls it's called hatred?!:huh:rofl

 

what pacquiao has accomplished is the last 2 years are greater than the entire career of PBF

 

I'm not gonna vote here, if i vote for pac i'm a floyd hater and dont know ****, if i vote for floyd i'm an idiot.

 

It's obviously Pacquiao's wins, and I'm glad to see sanity has prevailed and that is reflected in the poll score.

Morales and Barrera were far greater fighters than Castillo and Corrales were.

 

O.W.N.E.D.