Better Victory? Frazier over Ali or LaMotta over Robinson? Why?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Boxed Ears, Mar 28, 2010.


  1. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,102
    10,513
    Jul 28, 2009
    As far as I can tell, it's mostly thought that LaMotta and Frazier have their absolute best wins here. Career defining moments in the careers of future HOFers against future HOFers. Both tried to repeat their successes and failed more than once. Both were aggressive, risk-taking, come forward at all costs fighters going up against fast, long and lean boxers. Both fights highly competitive with notorious knockdowns scored by the victors. Robinson at a significant weight disadvantage whereas Ali was not at the peak of his powers like his opponent. Both LaMotta and Frazier gaining victory over historically far higher rated opponents. Which win was better? Which impresses you more? Which do you find more meaningful? Let's compare and contrast, gentlemen.



    This content is protected


    This content is protected
     
  2. My2Sense

    My2Sense Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,935
    92
    Aug 21, 2008
    I'd give it to Frazier. As noteworthy as LaMotta's win was, he still had something like a 15 or so pound weight advantage, which would be considered almost absurd against a WW if not for the fact that the WW happens to be Robinson. The FOTC was a much bigger and more meaningful fight with more on the line, also.
     
  3. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,102
    10,513
    Jul 28, 2009
    That's what I'm thinking too but every now and again I'll see a discussion on here and it will completely alter my perception. So, I wanted to float this one and hang back to see what you all have to say.
     
  4. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    It's tough. Robinson was just going on a tear. He was outweighed by about 15 pounds, but Ali was coming off a 3+ year layoff. They're very close. After LaMotta beat him Robinson went on another strong streak so I think that tells a bit about it. I've leaned on Frazier on this issue before so It's real close. But I think I might say slightly for LaMotta. Robinson beat LaMotta in the rematches within the next two years and then went unbeaten till 51 against Turpin. That was another 8 or so years.

    Tough one to call. The fact that Frazier I think is a better fighter respectively at their weightclasses, and the fact that SRR was probably in the prime of his career and is the GOAT while Ali was off 4 years... yeah I just slightly go with the bull. And he won so convincingly. Yet in the next year SRR was beating LaMotta with a 10-12 pound disadvantage, still. Lastly, SRR won the first bout between them.

    Isn't Tunney's win over Greb equally comparable?

    Maybe I'll break it down like this.

    Better Victory: Frazier
    Better Performance: LaMotta

    And yes, I know it's not a filmed performance.

    *Edit* I almost forgot. Robinson beat LaMotta 3 weeks after the fight. And convincingly so it shows he was capable of beating Jake. Maybe Jake was drained at such a quick return fight?
     
  5. My2Sense

    My2Sense Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,935
    92
    Aug 21, 2008
    To LaMotta-Robinson? Greb was already well-established at 175, much moreso than Robby 160 at that time, and held a version of the title. Plus Tunney didn't always have such a big weight advantage.


    He'd also beaten LaMotta a few months before that fight. Which is another angle to consider: it took LaMotta two fights in order to figure out Ray, but Frazier only needed one for Ali.
     
  6. My2Sense

    My2Sense Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,935
    92
    Aug 21, 2008
    It should be remembered that Robby had moved up from lightweight not too long before beginning his series with LaMotta. At the time of their first few fights, he really was still only a natural jr. WW. That he weighed 2-3 pounds under the welter limit for fights at MW indicate he was not even a full fledged welter yet.
     
  7. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
     
  8. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    LaMotta must've been a chump, along with the rest.

    After that defeat he was undefeated for 8 years.

    Ali lost again after FOTC in 73 against Norton.

    Ali was also arguably better in 72-74 than in 71 due to rust.

    Just Devil's Advocate. Like I said maybe the better victory is Frazier, but the performance goes on the side of Jake. How many times does he beat a SRR prime versus prime? 1 maybe 2 out of 10? Even with that 10-12 lb advantage. Prime versus prime with Ali vs Frazier is like a 6-4/5-5/7-3 type series. It's just much more competed.

    Although, LaMotta probably won that controversial 3rd or 4th fight with Robinson. It was very close, a SD which had Sugar saying it was his toughest fight with Jake.
     
  9. Doc Dynamo

    Doc Dynamo Member Full Member

    232
    2
    Mar 12, 2010
    How many MWs of the 40s could win one fight in five against SRR at WW?

    I think Burley, Zale, Cerdan, and Holman Williams for sure.

    Maybe Eddie Booker. Lloyd Marshall if you count him as a MW and not a LH.
     
  10. horst

    horst Guest

    I go with this. Frazier-Ali for me.
     
  11. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    Frazier's win, for the simple fact that it was a 15 round championship fight.
     
  12. TheGreatA

    TheGreatA Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,241
    157
    Mar 4, 2009
    It may have been bigger for LaMotta though because at that time he was not yet a very highly regarded fighter although he had gone on a good streak of wins after their first fight when LaMotta was not even top 10 I believe. It was a huge upset and as a result there were calls to stop boxers from competing against much bigger opponents, although Robinson was able to deal with the size disadvantage in rematches.

    Ali was Ali but Frazier too was very highly regarded and many were picking him to win. Few gave LaMotta a chance against a man that had already beaten him.

    So I'd say that at the time it was bigger for LaMotta because it catapulted him from being largely unknown to being the number 1 ranked middleweight contender in the world. Frazier simply legitimized his claim as the best heavyweight in the world.

    However with the Frazier-Ali I fight having everything on the line from undefeated records to the heavyweight title as well as reputation and pride, and also being possibly the most publicized fight ever, I'd say that Frazier's win was better overall.
     
  13. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,132
    8,586
    Jul 17, 2009
    Pretty much how I see it.
     
  14. OBCboxer

    OBCboxer Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,949
    226
    Jun 2, 2007
    Boxed Ears, you ignorant slut....the Frazier victory is bettter. It's close but a clear decision for me.
     
  15. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,102
    10,513
    Jul 28, 2009
    That kind of language is a little bit unnecessary. This isn't the general forum, you know. :twisted: