BETTER WIN: Andre Ward vs Chad Dawson or Pacquiao vs De La Hoya?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Florez, Sep 9, 2012.


  1. jeffjoiner

    jeffjoiner Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,183
    5
    Jun 22, 2008
    Wow. I didn't think your head was so far in Pac's ass that you lost oxygen flow.

    Here's how bookmakers work: They manipulate the odds in order to get an equal amount of money placed on both contestants. That way they can take a cut of all wagers but not have to dip into their own funds to pay the winners. Get it?

    Oscar was a much bigger name than Manny. Casual fans flocked to his fights, and placed a lot of bets. The only way for the bookmakers to get more money on Manny was to set a line that would encourage people to do so.

    Revisionist history is forgetting that Oscar looked like drawn and pale at the weigh in.
     
  2. SJS19

    SJS19 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,479
    14
    Jun 13, 2011
    'But Meester Oscar was bigger than Manny. Manny was a 135lb Lightweight who had just beated the great David Diaz.'

    'Meester DeLaHoya was coming off the best win of his career against the Gayweather clone Steve Forbes. Meester Oscar had been a 147lb man before so he could be again.'
     
  3. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    yeah they manipulated it to the point that oscar was still a clear favorite. :lol: are you saying that pac was the real bookies favorite?
     
  4. SJS19

    SJS19 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,479
    14
    Jun 13, 2011
    No you ****ing ******, He's saying that anyone who saw the weigh in, and knew what they were looking at, realised that Oscar was in for a rough night.
     
  5. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    how did you know? you were just a a 15 year old kid back then eating cookies and milk? did you know the atmosphere in ESB even right after the weigh-in? people are still picking oscar.
     
  6. dodong

    dodong >>PACQUIAO Full Member

    28,160
    32
    Apr 14, 2007
    did you see the weigh in??
     
  7. SJS19

    SJS19 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,479
    14
    Jun 13, 2011
    I'd boxed more rounds at 15 than you will in your sad little life :lol:

    Look at DLH the way he is size wise compared to Pac. Look at the difference in muscle tone. :patsch

    Then look at Oscar when he gets in the ring and takes his robe off. Looked like a ****ing skeleton. Look at the colour of his skin, compare it to when he fought Mayweather at 154.
     
  8. jeffjoiner

    jeffjoiner Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,183
    5
    Jun 22, 2008
    :patsch My 8 year old nephew would probably understand this:

    The bookmakers don't care who will or who should win. All they care about is getting equal money on both sides.

    Oscar had more fans than Manny. The bookies were trying to entice bettors to put money on Manny so they set odds that made it riskier to bet on Oscar, more rewarding to bet on Manny.

    The odds have absolute jack **** to do with the real expectations of a fight and everything to do with what a bunch of casuals in Vegas for a weekend will bet on.

    For the record, Manny's large fanbase now moves lines as well. He was a 3.5 to 1 favorite over Cotto according to the bookies while most dedicated fans and writers considered the fight to be very close.
     
  9. jeffjoiner

    jeffjoiner Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,183
    5
    Jun 22, 2008
    Yes. It was carried live here in the US. Oscar looked rough.

    I also saw the Dawson/Ward weigh in. Dawson looked much healthier.
     
  10. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    55
    Dec 5, 2006
    MANNY PACQUIAO

    * Moved up 2 weight Classes @ Full 147 to fight Oscar De La Hoya (No Catch weight)
    This content is protected

    * Oscar De La Hoya previously won by UD against Steve Forbes @ 150 Catch weight.
    This content is protected
    This content is protected

    * Manny Pacquiao was a huge under dog in this fight.
    This content is protected

    * People was saying this was a Joke of a fight because of the Big size difference.
    This content is protected


    Oscar De La Hoya Previous weight against Forbes = 150 Pounds.
    Oscar De La Hoya Fight with Pacquiao = 147 Pounds.


    ANDRE WARD

    * Stayed in his division.
    This content is protected

    * Huge Favorite to win against Dawson.
    This content is protected

    * Dawson had to go down 1 division to fight Ward.
    This content is protected


    Chad Dawson Previous weight against Hopkins = 173.5 Pounds.
    Chad Dawson Fight with Andre Ward = 168 Pounds.

    This content is protected
     
  11. lester proctor

    lester proctor Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,393
    1
    Jul 2, 2011
    The 135-147 jump is not common for a guy that had 1 fight at LW, esp when 135 was his 5th division. Unprecedented in fact.

    It wasn't just the oddsmakers favoring DLH, it was even more lopsided with the experts, and forum posters of course. What was your prediction?

    Neither DLH nor Dawson should have fought at the weight. Who had the tougher task, hard to tell. Dawson was younger, but had to drop twice as much weight, had no credentials at 168, unlike DLH at welter. Nobody holds it against Ward that he stayed in his class, but don't you think the fight woulda been more challenging if he was coming up from 147/154, against that same or even worse Dawson?
     
  12. Bee KeepZ

    Bee KeepZ Roid City Full Member

    3,466
    1
    Nov 13, 2009
    Pretty much shows that they weren't around.
     
  13. Thatman

    Thatman No respond troll pactards banned

    5,744
    0
    Jun 10, 2012
    This is what your responding with...:patsch:rofl:rofl:rofl

    This is your rebuttal to what the poster just said to you?:patsch

    This is one of those ******* responses. Pugi was put in his place by SJS and like a *******, his response was this....

    *******s take notes; this is how you guys are looked at on forums......you come and try and give info, but when it's shown to be invalid or untrue or just straight up crazy, you stupid ****s resort to responses such as this.

    Pugi you were ****in ripped a new ******* by sjs...Responding with this just made you look worse. :hi:
     
  14. Thatman

    Thatman No respond troll pactards banned

    5,744
    0
    Jun 10, 2012
    I have watched boxing since early 90's and I could very well see that Oscar was a skeleton at the weigh in. Up until the weigh in I said 50/50 fight, but once I saw the weigh in I said Oscar was going to be dominated and probably retire.

    If you can't look at Oscar post weigh in and pre fight and see what some of us, who actually practice the sport see, then that's your handicap. That is your problem and your weakness when arguing with other posters.:deal
     
  15. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    let's us see your prediction back then? none because you are talking of hindsight. i woukd later bump some threads of people still picking oscar even after the weigh-in.