better win for Hopkins? TITO OR PAVLIK

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by PH|LLA, Oct 22, 2008.


  1. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    obviously we are still fresh off his amazing win over Pavlik but lets have a go at it anyways.
     
  2. Beenie

    Beenie Evolve already! Full Member

    19,105
    42
    Apr 12, 2008
    I gotta think it was the Tito fight because thats when most casual fans were first introduced to B-Hop. The build up to the fight was widely publicized and he was able to win via ko which is always important when casual fans are watching.
     
  3. mexican legend

    mexican legend MVP! Full Member

    17,356
    1
    Jul 19, 2008
    Who cares. (****ing with you) Pavlik because he is a natural 160 pound fighter not a welterweight coming up in weight.
     
  4. gottagivafight

    gottagivafight When you least expect it, expect it!!! banned Full Member

    6,566
    1,792
    Jun 14, 2008
    B-Hop handed both guys their first loss. But the Tito ass-whippin' put Hopkins in a position for better fights to fortify that legacy.
     
  5. Motor City Sam

    Motor City Sam Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,102
    1
    Mar 17, 2007
    I'd say Tito because of the KO and the odds against Hopkins, but I wouldn't argue with someone who said Pavlik, simply because of the seventeen year age difference and how high Palik was ranked. Seventeen years? That's unheard of.
     
  6. Motor City Sam

    Motor City Sam Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,102
    1
    Mar 17, 2007
    Really, ML, was the "f" word really called for there? :bart

    And you had been doing so well.
     
  7. BOGART

    BOGART Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,903
    259
    Jul 19, 2004
    Tito had a better career than Pavlik when they fought Hopkins. Tito made a ton of welterweight defenses and won some major fights while Pavlik won a couple signifigant fights at middleweight. Tito also rolled over a good William Joppy at middleweight to atleast prove he belonged in the division. Pavlik never fought at light heavy before the Hopkins fight. So Tito was the better opponent.

    The thing that gets the Pavlik win more credibility is the age factor, which is signifigant. But I think I'd give a close nod to Tito as being the better win. He was simply more of a proven fighter at all levels than Pavlik.
     
  8. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    don't be gay in my thread please k thx
     
  9. Motor City Sam

    Motor City Sam Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,102
    1
    Mar 17, 2007
    Relax, Pharoah. That's a running joke with me and Mexican Legend.
     
  10. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,120
    2,760
    Jul 20, 2004
    The fight with Hopkins was at 170, a catchweight and Pavlik had two fights there before.
     
  11. BOGART

    BOGART Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,903
    259
    Jul 19, 2004
    I don't think he fought anyone of note at that weight. I'd say Tito belonged at middleweight more than Pavlik at lightheavy. The Joppy win would trump the work Pavlik has done.
     
  12. mexican legend

    mexican legend MVP! Full Member

    17,356
    1
    Jul 19, 2008
    :lol: Sorry, I was doing so well in the beginning. Give me a pass on this one please. :D
     
  13. CarlesX7

    CarlesX7 Shit got real! Full Member

    13,209
    291
    Sep 23, 2008
    Yep. That and the fact that Hopkins is 43.
    Still, the Tito win was huge.
     
  14. mexican legend

    mexican legend MVP! Full Member

    17,356
    1
    Jul 19, 2008
    Why did you cut out the other part of my post ****ing NOOB? :D
     
  15. CarlesX7

    CarlesX7 Shit got real! Full Member

    13,209
    291
    Sep 23, 2008
    Don't use the "f" word you ****ing NOOB! :blurp