better win for Hopkins? TITO OR PAVLIK

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by PH|LLA, Oct 22, 2008.


  1. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Change that tagline to ESB's Most God-Awful Poster.
     
  2. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Yes of course amigo, why the change of account/username?

    What do you mean "in suggestions"? Are you posting on this thread?
     
  3. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    OK mate, I break for lunch in 15mins, will check it out then. You got kicked out?!?!? That's utterly insane. You're one of the most level-headed and quality posters on this site. Speak shortly.
     
  4. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    Sorry, but Joe has been in the position Cotto was in many times over, it's just that you don't think Cal's opponents are good. You check the pfp list right now, and a few of the fighters in the top 10 have not faced ATG's or pfp guys. Cal chose Jones because he is about to retire, period. Many of your posts are dull and biased. But then again, you don't think PAc has any chance to beat Dlh:rofl . Your posts are disgusting to read fanatic.
     
  5. 196osh

    196osh Mendes Bros. Full Member

    14,565
    11
    May 10, 2007
    Tito was a better fighter and also accompished more at 160 and below than Pavlik has at 160 and above, particularly above.
     
  6. PanchoVilla

    PanchoVilla Guest

    Trinidad bc hes a legend
     
  7. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Don't read them then. Save yourself the work, as reading must be pretty difficult for you, you are the least intelligent poster I've ever met on here.
     
  8. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    You're talking to me about reading, and you can even use a damn period to separate your run-on comma sentence!!!??? lol..:rofl