Better win: Fury-Klitschko or Joshua-Klitschko

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Slyk, Feb 9, 2024.


Which is the better win?

  1. 39 year old champion Klitschko in Germany

    78 vote(s)
    60.5%
  2. 41 year old beltless Klitschko in UK

    51 vote(s)
    39.5%
  1. exocet76

    exocet76 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,320
    17,506
    Feb 28, 2012
    You don't know Fury was always better than AJ, I mean you can think that but it's not based on reality. Fury has not proven himself against the majority of the top guys in the division. You get measured by what you've achieved not what you could of done, talking a good game doesn't mean anything. Fury has only done this to himself.
     
    Jackstraw and Bokaj like this.
  2. Shempz

    Shempz Active Member Full Member

    844
    734
    Mar 10, 2014
    Wow, bet you're fun at parties.
     
  3. miniq

    miniq AJ IS A BODYBUILDING BUM banned Full Member

    47,469
    27,240
    Oct 23, 2011
    Imagine 40% of people picking AJ Wlad LOOOOL!

    deluded haters
     
  4. KINGWILDER

    KINGWILDER Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,789
    2,597
    May 11, 2023
    The irony of your comment went straight over your head didn’t it.
     
  5. Slyk

    Slyk Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,633
    4,289
    Dec 5, 2010
    It was 20%, but then Joshua beat a 40 year old Helenius. People really loved that.
     
  6. miniq

    miniq AJ IS A BODYBUILDING BUM banned Full Member

    47,469
    27,240
    Oct 23, 2011
    Helenius had him reeling as well. Which is why Francis is going to chin the bodybuilder. It will be a reality check for everyone. Francis is one of them guys who you can't rely on your power to save you.
     
  7. Slyk

    Slyk Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,633
    4,289
    Dec 5, 2010
    It looks like people need a reminder about this one.

    Defeating a 39 year old champion in his back yard is better than defeating a 41 year old challenger with two years of ring rust in your own backyard. Simple.