Better Win: Pacquiao TKO 12 Cotto @ 145 or Mayweather UD Cotto @ 154?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Florez, Aug 24, 2013.


  1. Florez

    Florez Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,134
    0
    Sep 7, 2011

    Should have been more, Don't know how to post a poll that can see users who voted.
     
  2. Davo

    Davo Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,977
    504
    May 27, 2010
    I'm actually gonna say 154. Mainly cos Cotto was in a horrible place mentally after Margo beat him down with concrete and Clottey took him to war. Add in 2 lbs of weight loss and we have a guy who was always gonna struggle with a prime, beast Pacman.

    At 154 Cotto was healty, better trained and mentally focused against an older, slower Mayweather.
     
  3. Florez

    Florez Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,134
    0
    Sep 7, 2011

    Miguel Cotto weighed in @ 146 against Clottey which was only 5 months apart from the Pacquiao fight and also Cotto has said,

    PC: Was coming down to 145 tougher than you thought it would be since you hadn't weighed 145 or less since 2006?

    Miguel Cotto: I felt really good at that weight. It wasn't a problem for me.

    Fight Hype.
     
  4. Leonit

    Leonit Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,331
    4
    Jan 6, 2009
    You imply that Pac beating the **** out of him somewhat negated the effect of the beating Margo gave him?
     
  5. TJ Max

    TJ Max Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,300
    345
    Jun 2, 2013
    LOL at Cotto being a natural 154 lb fighter.

    If he was a natural 154 lb fighter he wouldn't have looked like a tiny midget against Trout, and got the **** beat outta him.

    ****, he's not even bigger than Rios or Alvarez, and they fight at 140.
     
  6. Davo

    Davo Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,977
    504
    May 27, 2010
    Congratulations for reposting sh*t we have all seen before.

    Congratulations also for only addressing the one side point I threw in and ignoring the more important ones.

    Final congratulations for being a complete and utter f*ckin d*ckhead :good
     
  7. Florez

    Florez Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,134
    0
    Sep 7, 2011

    Relax mate, no need to take things serious. just stating what Cotto said.
     
  8. bandido

    bandido The Black Bandit Full Member

    6,638
    2
    Feb 25, 2010
    This is a no contest.
     
  9. -GhettoWizard-

    -GhettoWizard- Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,858
    0
    Feb 28, 2013
    How was Foreman injured? He always wore that brace on his leg. Nice try though man, it was Cotto that beat the injury into him.

    and it doesn't change the fact that pac ducked mosley to take on cotto who looked like crap against clottey and still needed to drain him down even more :hi::hi:
     
  10. Davo

    Davo Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,977
    504
    May 27, 2010
    No worries mate. I'm sorry mate. I didn't realise we were mates. Feel free to address the rest of my points mate, not just the least significant mate.
     

  11. Come on you two, be nice to each other, you're mates after all aren't ya's mate ?
     
  12. Davo

    Davo Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,977
    504
    May 27, 2010
    Good point mate. Sorrys all round mates.
     
  13. Florez

    Florez Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,134
    0
    Sep 7, 2011
    Pac way ahead.
     
  14. Beremith

    Beremith Active Member Full Member

    971
    151
    Feb 22, 2008

    What bizarro world is this? Cotto had two losses by the time he faced Mayweather.
     
  15. prelude

    prelude Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,924
    7
    Nov 12, 2010
    PAC fought a shot Cotto. Floyd fought an undefeated unshot Cotto who wasn't drained and was hydrated at his best weight...please remember that.