Betty Swollocks - Is this what you mean?

Ah, no, definetly not. I thik he has potential to be in some great fights, but for that to happen, he would need an opponent to really bounce of his style. I think a fight with Pacquiao would be good, but someone like Juan Diaz would be another stinker.

 

.........

 

Hold on. Where does Hatton say he's never heard of Cotto in there?

I've looked but I can't find it.

This is a really, really, really, **** thread and it's all getting a bit pathetic now.

Don't you feel even a little bit ashamed for posting this, and putting a pathetic, non-existent angle on it?

 

I ain't even gonna rise to it!!

BTW Jack, you're a good guy and a real boxing fan.

 

Too true that. I personally have no problem with anybody not liking Hatton (or any other boxer) for their style in the ring or their personality out of it. It's part of life. But if I don't like a fighter, I will say my piece and then have done with it. I won't resort to starting a dozen threads a day trying to twist everything he says in a negative way: "Ricky Hatton takes a ****, does he not give a toss about the environment". That sort of thing just makes you look like a schizo who has some kind of irrational hate thing going.

 

I kind of want Hatton and Mayweather to fight againd just to see Hatton humiliated.

 

You still havn't explained the **** stirring tone of the thread title?

 

:-(

 

I'm not clutching at anything

You are the one clutching at straws with your interpretation of what he said

It is a tad pathetic fella, no offence meant, but think about it. You are picking apart a statement and looking for hidden meaning that isn't actually there

In fact it may be more than pathetic, it is borderline obsessive

 

:rofl

 

He didn't 'plainly state' that at all. Or it would be easy for you to quote.

 

Surely you're not suggesting this is another anti Hatton stirring thread.... :stir

:-(