Honestly....... B Hop- Dawson is more interesting........ Froch- Bute is more exciting....... I guess the B Hop fight is only interesting because they are the top two guys and its interesting to see if B Hop will actually survive or not
Are they scheduled for the same night? ....no? Don't matter then. :good I like both of them fights. Action-packed fight in Bute-Froch, Tactics 101 (masters/doctorate level) in BHop-Dawson II.
I was prediciting Dawson to win via UD (in this fight anyway) at age 47 I just don't think his (BHop) body can carry him to the finish line, I can even see him leading after 8-9 rounds but letting it slip near the end.
Wise prediction. However I don't believe Dawson can charge that often and in such a hard pace like Calzaghe did... Even at age 47, I must give you my prediction.- Hop will fight out of character once he feels he is getting tagged too many times and then we will see who has the mental strength to swim in very deep and troubled waters. Never bet against Hopkins, he is not an average individual, that number 47 doesn't mean that much. But t y 4 letting me know. I do respect that.
as far as answering the question, Hopkins vs. Dawson is the more interesting fight, as it is historically significant and the thought time may catch up to Hopkins is always intriguing. However, the better fight will almost no doubt be Bute vs Froch. can't wait to see it!