Bhop is a legend, Joe is not

No, my inclination to see what was painfully obvious that the bias cheating judge Chuck Giampa(who everybody knows hates hopkins and even more because of the comment hopkins made) didn't see and yourself of course along with all the die hard Calzaghe fans is a good way to sum up the scoring mishap, except for the ring side observers like brain kenny who could clearly see that Joe didn't even land nearly half the goddamn punches they said he did. But to naked eye of course, it was more than evident that Hopkins landed the cleaner more effective punches and controled the ring with his defensive prowess and ring intelligence and clearly won more than enough rounds, along with the knockdown to earn him a unanimous decision.(he was also the champion, but I forgot this ain't the old school no more):roll:

 

Only if Calzaghe had some worthy names on his resume, than it would of been Hopkins worth while cause you and everybody knows he doesn't get credit if kicks joe's ass back in 02.(and you know he would of)

 

ridicule,boy,slaps etc uummhhhhhhhhhh your an orphan right,with a tragic childhoood bent on revenge against the welsh and anyone who dares to question your right to adulthood the hate towards joe is a throwback to earlier times when you were repeatedly slapped in the face by a girl who wouldnt adhere to your advances on the grounds of your simply being a lemming.the hate is missplaced,hopkins has a similar syndrome its called nutthe****usoutofusthewelshladusindesperation itis!

 

zzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

 

Bad language has been used by intelligent people since the dawn of time, I assure you. However using "lol" and including constant spelling and grammatical errors in your post will show you up for what you truly are, if you get my drift :good

Goodnight, drink less tomorrow and you might be a match for me.

 

More Americans disagree with you than agree with you.

 

Calzaghe was undefeated champion. You're clutching at straws. Hopkins (for whatever reason) backed out.

 

Nope, sorry, undefeated with more bums than worthy opposition don't count.

 

so youre saying jones is'nt old?:blood

 

It's also true to say that you're clutching at straws when you make excuses for Calzaghe backing out of fighting Johnson. Twice :yep

Oh wait, he had a sore back, and then a painful divorce, right? I guess that's OK then.

 

the thread starter has made posts before about how the only current WW right now that tito would beat is Quintana. :nut

 

i cannot spellcheck and edit my every word life is just too short and grammar is so trivial when engaging with a wit who moves at your swift pace,i prefer the off the cuff urgency of this little back n forth we are so ensconsed in, not the pedantics and critique you would find in a great aurator's vernacular just little you and me talking,thinking,flirting.lol.

 

, yea if you subtract all the welshmen, than the poll would be onesided in hopkins favor. But Calzaghe gets his dick sucked by so many euor's it's impossible to make them believe it.

 

Old is a relative term in boxing....compared to Foreman when he won the title then Jones isn't old I suppose, but there again Foreman hadn't been P4P best in the world for years on end and moved up from 160 to heavy and then down again. Calslappy on the other hand has been through so many tough wars at 168 he's bound to have more wear and tear than Jones. Who can forget his life and death struggle against Robin Reid? Or his epic battle with Peter Manfredo?

Some of the above is sarcasm, by the way.

 

Calzaghe's next performance, itself, is extremely important. If he looks "bad" again, irrespective of a win, he will be forever thought of as a frantic amateur style pro by a certain segment of the community.