Yeah, and Joe C is ssssoooooooo young at the age of 36. If you want to talk age, he is clearly at an age when he could get old overnight!!!
If Joe wins Hopkins was old ..If Hopkins wins Joe was overratted ..Its a no win for either side .. I am picking Joe by split deceision ..But look forward to a hell of a fight ..When Hopkins does get countd out he peforms at a higher level ..Great fight !!
That's only true for some fans on this site. Not too many respected posters would say something like that. The little kids will have a field day I'm sure.
Hopkins cannot win in a legitimate fashion at this point so it's not even worth thinking of an answer, a DQ against Joe perhaps while he's getting trashed, but is that really a win? In that regard you'd just have to look at the circumstances.
That's all I'm saying. It certainly has a greater chance of happening to BHOP because in all fairness, he is ancient. But many many fighters have gotten old overnight at the age of 36.
Hops already got old overnight back a couple of years. Calzaghe's just declined from his prime but still very potent, that's basically what Hopkins was post-2000 up until about 2004 when he started showing drastic decline.
Joe Calzaghe is no LHW Michael Moorer, but P4P the HW version is not comparable. LHW version is better, Moorer was excellence. Haye-Moorer prime to prime sounds kind of fun, both can be starched.
No, I'd say it's because you're too chicken**** to answer that. I asked you twice, and you won't answer.