B'hops resume is not as good as people say

What a lot of ****ing dog****.

Calzaghe's feeble resume must be better than B-Hop's because Hopkins was tall for a middleweight?!??

Try again dickhead. Hopkins's resume ****ing embarrasses Calzaghe's pile of garbage.

 

For a start Calzaghe didnt lose twice to B-level average Jermain Taylor who got absolutely whipped by 1-D Pavlik.

If you gave Calzaghe all of Hopkins fights Calzaghe would only have 1-loss to prime Roy Jones he would have won every other fight and much more convincingly.

Whats the arguements against that ?

 

Its surprising the short memories on this board.

 

Ok...so why can't I say Tito was a big WW or Winky was a big JMW?

 

I love the General Forum!

 

I agree ... his biggest wins are over Tito, Winky and DLH ... everyone else is somewhat suspect ... he lost to Roy, Calzaghe & Jermain ... he beat Tarver but who gives a **** ...

You think about it ... his 3 biggest wins were against guys who were naturally smaller than him ...

 

he as a big WW, but a WW is still 2 weight classes below the weight class that Hopkins squeezed himself into.

Dont you realize that hopkins fought winky at 170?

 

atsch

 

Hey chinchecker,

How come you NEVER went back to you thread? :huh

:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

So your saying Calzaghe would have done worse than Hopkins if he had fought a mirror of Hopkins resume.

I'm gonna love hearing your reasoning for this.

 

You obviously missed the other thread !

 

Look its a legit point, there's no really easy way to argue it. Calzaghe wins vs: ODLH, Tito, Winky, Jermain Taylor. If you disagree, you're stupid.

 

Why dont you share yours?! :roll:

 

This thread should get stickied!