Biased fans, corrupt judges, ward didn't win

Absolutely.

Corruption and bent decisions definitely exist in boxing, no doubt about that whatsoever!

.... except when it involves your favourite fighter. Isn't that right, fan boys?

 

The boxing fans themselves is a major reason they can get away with swinging the winner as they wish . They know a huge majority will see a popular favorite as the winner. How and why is another question of obvious delusional of ones sight . No credible fan or even biased individual would give Ward the win,surely at least watching it twice. Fans will continue to shoot themselves in the foot, because in the end boxing loses because im pretty sure the judges already had a winner picked out before the bell even rung.

 

Fans can't be trusted but the media can and from the looks of it most boxing writers had Kovalev as the victor.
This may sound odd but had it been a draw I could have understood but I can't see where the judges have found the seventh round from?

 

The word Robbery is so overused its insane, there were a number of close rounds in this fight that could potentially have swung it one way or the other, but for me Wards work was more effective!!

 

Very true unfortunately,there has to be a call to have neutral judges brought in for big fights,I'm a cricket fan and they brought in a rule for neutral umpires so in England no English Umpire can stand in the match and same for India,Australia ect,it was done because they're were too many wrong decisions because of bias,I believe this has to be done in boxing and every effort should be made to school the judges about corruption at the top cause if you think it doesn't exist then you must be blind?

 

Even Kovalev can,t beat corruption

 

There are indeed many biased and idiotic fans...

 

He did win though. 114-113, it's an undeniable fact.

 

How could if have been a draw with a 10-8 round for Kovalev? You would have to either score a round even, or take a point away from Ward, it's impossible to have it a draw. 7 rounds to 5 for Ward is the correct score.

 

I have studied boxing a long time even corrected a few known sports writers and have found holes in quite a few popular fights where the winner didnt actually win that would inflict riots on here.lol

That being said there simply is no practical reason to award the fight to Ward,he simply lost and did so clearly. Now i usually watch a fight 5/6 times and watch the most important part of the round 3 times or more .....turn off the sound and its one of the easiest fights to determine who ACTUALLY won and that would be Kovalev.

 

Sure, I'll be honest. I had the fight for Ward.

 

Oh right I'm with you I'd not thought of that,so it had to be 7 rounds to five either way,that said I still can't see where they get seven rounds from,I can only presume they've given Ward round one and if that's the case then they must be blind as Ward was hurt in that first round and was out gunned.