None of the stylistic considerations in this fight, are relevant to in Frazier Foreman! Frazier Foreman was a great fight, but it was not the only fight. You should not build all of your stylistic ideas around that fight!
I think that a more pertinent question, is who Bowe desplayed his skills against. Outside of Holyfield, his record at elite level, is verry thin. In fact he is almost Douglasesqu, in his reliance on a single win! Dempsey actualy did a lot more against the top fighters of the day.
if we're comparing quality, i agree. but stylistically and in examining the "giant-slayer" image of demspey, bowe presents a very unique challenge. bowe didn't face an opponent as fast or ferocious as dempsey but dempsey never faced someone as big or skilled as bowe. the fact that dempsey did great inside work against his opponents is relevant to his skill but i don't feel he'll have the ability to demonstrate that against a motivated bowe bowe had a GREAT jab to keep him on the outside and when dempsey works his way in, he'll have a fit, muscular 225 pound man who loves to brawl and uppercut waiting for him. not saying bowe necessarily wins but dempsey will not be able to run circles around and outpunch bowe the way he did some of his (relatively) clumsy and uncoordinated opposition
All of this is completely missing the point. What do you know about Dempsey in drawn out, tough fights where he is on the receiving end? Longer distance affairs where he absorbs a serious amount of punishment. I will tell you the answer. The answer, if you exclude the Tunney fight, is absolutely nothing. If you include the Tunney fight strictly as a matter of understanding durability then you have data. This is better than no data. So no, his vision doesn't matter, his drive doesn't matter, even his stamina doesn't matter as much as it would if we were using "that version". In my post I say that Dempsey's chances hinge on the fact, in my opinion, that Bowe always let his man inside (if that man wanted to be there) when he got tired. When he got tired in a hard fight. Burt seems to think only the Toledo footage should be allowable. This is fine if your only prediction ever for any Dempsey fight is "Dempsey KO3". Otherwise, you have to work harder. My post talks about a long, killing fight. That's my breakdown. This being the case how each man behaves when punished is absolutely key. But, according to some - I think three posters now - the only data in existence for Dempsey is not allowable. Well, that's fine, I guess we'll roll with KO3 then. I think that these two guys are going to utterly thrash each other. I'm most interested in how they behave when they are getting hit for this reason.
He did, but there is a marked decline for Dempsey outside of Toledo, too. He looks outstanding in other films, but the only film of his absolute prime is against Willard. I think it's fair to take Bowe from Holyfield I and match him with Dempsey from Willard and leave it at that...leave the resumes for the parallel argument about greatness.
I think this is a great post because it gets to the crux of the matter, but I also thin it is possible that you are wrong. I think Dempsey's footwork is second to none, perhaps, for HW swarmers, he really could be balletic. The problem is his nature, and as you've said, Bowe's jab. In combination this might turn a balletic performance into a stalking one in quick smart time. Based on what I know that is what I would expect. Points for Bowe, and then, at some point, the break and Dempsey gets in, stays there. How many rounds Bowe can swing in the pocket may be the crucial factor.
Why can't they both survive? Dempsey was only knocked out once. Bowe, never. Bowe is huge and Dempsey is quick. I think it would be an attrition type knockout if one came.
the easy answer is that the tunney fights are all we have evidence of to analyze your scenario. The gibbons fight adds nothing to our understanding of how jack would fare in a long drawn out war. dempsey was past his best, yes but as you said it's all we have. the willard footage is great but i really think we need to acknowledge the context and that 1)willard was old 2)willard wasn't that tremendous 3)the lack of a neutral corner rule COMPLETELY affected the outcome. would dempsey have won otherwise? probably. but it's a lot easier to look like a monster beating on a man as he struggles to get to his feet
i'm starting to like this scenario more and more. does bowe have the physicality to force dempsey off him? dempsey is powerful for his size as burt wisely pointed out. so is holyfield and (just watched some clips from their fights) bowe never tried nor appeared consistently able to force evander back. bowe LIKED it on the inside, so how will he fare against someone who's even better at it than he is...(this point was already raised by mcgrain and others of course)
I never thought much of Bowe, I was impressed with him when he won the light heavyweight title in the NY Golden Gloves but from there he got bigger and slower and was always easy to hit. Riddick had a good foundation, he had size but he got hit to much I think Dempsey hits him and does his damage early Dempsey KO 8-9
PP (an other Bowe supporters), In picking Bowe, how do you get past the first Holyfield fight, where from my recollection Holyfield appeared to land the left hook at will. Now Bowe was impressive and i thought he showed all time great heart, and again underated skills in some of his later fights. But, there is no escaping the ease with which Holyfield landed that left hook. I dont see how Dempsey would fail to do the same, despite the fact that i am sure Bowe would land his share of big shots and i think it is probably agreed that He might even present Prime Dempsey's biggest challenge. I still cant see any chin standing up to the same number of hooks that Bowe was hit with against Holyfield. Am i just remembering the fight wrong? It has been a while since i watched.
This would be a great fight. The Bowe who beat Holyfield v. the Dempsey who beat Willard. I feel Dempsey was comparable to Holyfield, a bit smaller, and maybe not as strong, but with more punch power. Absolutely vicious on the inside. Bowe has all the physical advantages (height, weight, reach), had his own excellent inside game and ample power too. He's there to be hit though. This would be a real vicious brawl. Both were rough dirty fighters, with skills and heart and durability. Probably would end in KO, wouldn't be surprised to see both men hit the deck. If it did happen to go the distance, I'd favour Bowe. More likely, it would end by KO, any time between the 3rd and 10th round ... with either fighter being victorious in a brutal classic.
you're bang on and bowe's lack of defense is a critical factor in this fight. holyfield landed that left a lot. and that left hook, while more textbook and educated than dempsey's, was not nearly as fast as dempsey's imo. dempsey would land once he got inside, that's almost a given. how bowe responds is the question...
that's what she said. Anyway if there's a KO i'd expect it to be a flash KO for Dempsey or an attrition KO for Bowe.