Big Guys Who Somehow Lack Physical Strength?

1) I was extremely logical & systematic & even literally enumerated all of my points.
It seems unlikely you *can* refute me, & you have no cause to smear me as being mentally disturbed.

2) You did not show my grammar was bad at all.
That is a change from the claim I provided a "wall of text"-after I showed I wrote in reasonable paragraphs.
It is ironic that you were both mean *and* showed poor grammar in writing "your grammar is ass".

3) I was not trying to impress anyone when I described what my arm size & strength was.
And I both visually & by the charts was never obese-mid-late 20's body fat level will add an inch over not being at all overweight, ~ 1.5" over being really cut.
You ostentatiously AVOIDED the points I was nice enough to mamke very clear: that the numbers & weights I listed are around the maximum abyone with around an average frame (height & bone structre will achieve WITHOUT drugging up with PEDs.
That is why I listed something like 10 reps with 120 lbs. Dumbbell presses: because I rarely tried max lifts, & it is absurd to think a regular man will hit say a set with 150's lifetime clean.

4) You are repeatedly insulting, even vicious from the anonymous distance of the Internet.
I did not treat you like that-why even come here IF you are going to be so petty & nasty?

5) You copied a line where I had a typo, repeating a word...Cherry picking a tiny matter to be NASTY saying I write like I have a stroke?
If this is how you behave in regular life-with *anyone*-realize you are a malicious, gratuitously cruel person.

6) You again avoided all the SUBSTANCE of what I showed when you piled up that irrational hate speech.
Which is: you did not pay attention to what I wrote.
You CONFESSED to an attention span problem, but are absurd in trying to put the stigma upon me-instead of apologizing & appreciating how I broke things down by well numbered points.
And you are unwilling to even look up the various names I gave you for what is achievable in a lifetime of all NATURAL lifting.
To call that "bro science" without any knowledge of the large studies done is a complete fabrication.

7) I never remotely said that what I achieved was anywhere near "unbeatable", even naturally.
You must be very Ego based to project that upon me.
Once more-I merely said that the evidence shows that is near the maximum of what people of around average structure can achieve naturally. I never "paraded", nor bragged.

8) It is now embarrassingly clear that you are unable to deal with any honest communication about what DRUGS, PEDs. do.
Never answering anything about it means you are likely ashamed or at least uncomforatable with this reality-likely because you have done plenty of PEDs.

I never slammed it; but when you say something mean & reason-free like my lifetime numbers are "crap"...
Despite being free of even Creatine & without any devices like straps or belts or special shirts or suits...
It is obvious you are threatened because what you do & worship are lifting with lots of performance enhancing drugs.

If I said I pressed 545 3X with free weights that would be true.
But DECEPTIVE. Like you constantly avoiding any talk or answers about the numbers you revere being very drug-inflated.
See that was a "pin press". For others, that means you have that weight on the metal pins of a power rack, & move the weight very few inches (but if too little, you will not get enough leverage)-then let the weight slam down & try to do more reps.

If I did lots of PEDs effectively, maybe my 3 rep max woupld be 545 on a bench press, instead of over 200 lbs. south of that!
This is roughly what effective dosing-certainly likely with equipment like a bench shirt-can do for many.