Bigger Comeback KO: Marciano/JJW or Big George/Moorer

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by dbouziane, Jan 19, 2010.


  1. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    52,225
    27,733
    Jan 3, 2007
    If memory serves, I think Joe Walcott was knocked out cold by that huge shot that Marciano decked him with.. Michael Moorer was very badly hurt and required multiple stiches around and in the mouth, but I don't think he was unconcious like Walcott was. Therefore, Rocky's KO was probably more devastating.
     
  2. ricardoparker93

    ricardoparker93 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,831
    12
    May 30, 2009
    Foreman literally had no hope of winning that fight where at least the rock was wearing JJW down. In terms of how they were both doing in the fight I would say Foremans is the bigger comeback KO
     
  3. dbouziane

    dbouziane ............. Full Member

    11,049
    27
    Nov 4, 2007
    i agree 100% that the rock's ko of jjw was the more devastating of the two. but what do you think about the historical significance of both. one being the start of something great and the other being rather improbable (at least it was thought at the time)
     
  4. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    52,225
    27,733
    Jan 3, 2007

    That makes for a very interesting question, and one that would probably get different answers from a lot of various people. I think that its pretty hard to top the historical magnitude of George Foreman becoming the oldest man to win the heavyweight title and a two time winner at that. He also had a career that was divided by a 10 year retirement. Additionally, he was battling a 25 year old man who was undefeated and in the prime of his career, whereas circumstances were reversed in the Marciano-Walcott fight.. I will say however, that Marciano Walcott I battle was a true war, while Foreman vs Moorer wasn't. It was defenately the better fight from an action standpoint. Not sure which one holds more significance though, but for statistical reasons, I'll take Foreman vs Moorer.
     
  5. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    119
    Oct 9, 2008
    Foreman's KO over Moorer in '94 is the bigger and greater upset..... To me, Foreman regaining the title at age 45 from a skilled but chinny 26 year old Michael Moorer is the greatest sports comeback of all-time...... Foreman was ONLY a 2 to 1 underdog on the sports books, but, he was the underdog and hardly anyone truly believed he'd beat Moorer by 10th round KO!!

    If memory serves me right, I could be wrong here, but I think Marciano was the installed as the slight favorite to topple Walcott in '52........ Marciano was dropped in round 1 and looked like a rookie in the early going before lowering the boom in round 13....... It too is a great come-from-behind win, but I'll still take Foreman's return to the top as # 1.......
    :thumbsup:bbb:good:yep

    MR.BILL
     
  6. dbouziane

    dbouziane ............. Full Member

    11,049
    27
    Nov 4, 2007
    excellent post :good
     
  7. RockyJim

    RockyJim Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,262
    2,478
    Mar 26, 2005
    Marciano's of course....taking a beating...blinded for 3 rounds...cut and floored for the first time...behind on all score cards...and then comes back with the most brutal right hand ever thrown to win the crown...
     
  8. dbouziane

    dbouziane ............. Full Member

    11,049
    27
    Nov 4, 2007
    all this is true. but some posters on here feel big george was in more dire straits in the moorer fight than the rock was despite being down early...and by dire straits i mean that he was less competitive in his fight than the rock was in his
     
  9. Dempsey1238

    Dempsey1238 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,737
    3,589
    Jul 10, 2005
    hard to say.

    History wise, the Rock's ko over Walcott(First fight) gets talk a lot more than Foreman's over Moore.

    Foreman was loseing most of that fight, were the Rock did his damage on Walcott before the 13th. Round 3 and 4 were pretty bad for Walcott, and the Rock landed a booming shot in round 7(The fame pic taking).

    I put Marciano over Foreman in this regard, as the ko was the start of the Marciano era, and Foreman's comeback era??? was coming to end.
     
  10. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    119
    Oct 9, 2008
    Foreman all the way......... A thrilling and historical moment in time.........

    MR.BILL:happy:good
     
  11. dbouziane

    dbouziane ............. Full Member

    11,049
    27
    Nov 4, 2007
    like i said, i can see it both ways :good
     
  12. djanders

    djanders Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,065
    6,949
    Feb 21, 2009
    I'm going with Foreman's KO on this. Oldest heavyweight champion. Dramatic comeback all the way. Further behind on cards. Moorer never knocked out before. Moorer undefeated at that time.
     
  13. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,860
    10,069
    Jul 15, 2008
    Absolutely. Marciano/Walcott was an extremely competitive fight. Rocky was coming n and Walcott was tiring. Marciano was far stronger although Joe was still dangerous. If Rocky won the final three rounds or two of the three he would have won the decision, especially with a knockdown thrown in.

    I though the question was best come from behind KO (comeback) ... as far as pure KO goes Rocky's was a better looking punch although anyone who says the Foreman shot was not major was wrong. Teddy Atlas dscrbes the damage it did from a physical standpoint as major.
     
  14. ironchamp

    ironchamp Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,365
    1,037
    Sep 5, 2004
    Easily Foreman vs. Moorer.

    Rocky Marciano was in the fight the entire way.

    Foreman was not. Therefore his KO was far more surprising and given the magnitude of the event and the circumstances I think his comeback KO was simply bigger.
     
  15. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    119
    Oct 9, 2008
    :good:hey:happy:deal:thumbsup:hat