Bigger puncher at 147 Cotto or Oscar?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by EL-MATADOR, Nov 7, 2008.


Page 2 of 2
  1. KCD

    KCD All aboard. Full Member

    8,219
    2
    Sep 30, 2007
    Oscar.

    And i dont think its even close.
     
    KCD, Nov 7, 2008
    KCD, Nov 7, 2008
    #16
  2. Beenie

    Beenie Evolve already! Full Member

    19,105
    42
    Apr 12, 2008
    I voted for Oscar because of the natural size difference and he had more one punch power.
     
    Beenie, Nov 7, 2008
    Beenie, Nov 7, 2008
    #17
  3. mexican legend

    mexican legend MVP! Full Member

    17,356
    1
    Jul 19, 2008
    Oscar no doubt.
     
    mexican legend, Nov 7, 2008
    mexican legend, Nov 7, 2008
    #18
  4. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,059
    35,171
    Jun 23, 2005
    Oscar
     
    Pimp C, Nov 7, 2008
    Pimp C, Nov 7, 2008
    #19
  5. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    Oscar by a pretty fair margin. It's pretty ridiculous that Cotto has 21 votes.
     
    Sweet Pea, Nov 7, 2008
    Sweet Pea, Nov 7, 2008
    #20
  6. rluevano

    rluevano El Gato De Culiacan Full Member

    639
    1
    Jun 14, 2006
    Oscar and it should be obvious. His left hook was dynamite at that weight and probably comparable to Tito's left hook. Cotto's power significantly dropped when he moved up to 147. His power was good, but not devastating as most fighters he fought took a lot of punishment before succumbing to him.
     
    rluevano, Nov 7, 2008
    rluevano, Nov 7, 2008
    #21
Page 2 of 2