**bigger robbery desicion: PBF v. JLC I or JMM v. Pacquiao I?**

neither. those fights are too close to consider it a robbery.

 

ummm, you must be new to boxing... there is no such thing as a 9-9 round , unless the round is a draw and each fighter also had a point deducted.

 

uhhhhhm, point deductions

 

maybe the scorecards are too wide, but the decision as a whole is not a robbery.

 

uhhhhhhm? I said that? Uhhhhhm?

 

They deduced 2 points total in the fight on two separate occasions, one from each guy.

Jose for hitting on the break in the 8th.

Then Floyd had one jacked in the 10th.

 

I forgot about the deductions, been years since I watched... I thought you scored them 9-9 as draw rounds... my bad gangsta

 

why the hell would he be new to boxing?

 

As a pbf fan i sat an watched castillo
fight and i feel it would hav been SD at the very least if not a draw. But you know you were
robbed when judges score it
111-115

 

Those fight were at least legit close. Hard to call them a robbery, when it's almost 50/50 in who people thought won.

Thats why there is three judges, because different people have different views.

I'd rather address how ridiculous a deicison like Casamayor SD12 Santa Cruz was, or Whitaker D12 Chavez was...

 

affirmative action saved Julio. Blacks have been historically dominant in boxing, so they used AA to give the "underdog" a hand

 

What about the judge that had the fight 115-110 for Pac(meaning Pac didn't even need the first round to win on his scorecards).........Was that also an honest mistake:think