Bigger threat to Fraud? Shane or DLH???

Creating another thread instead of addressing my points, fair enough. Most people will pick Shane simply due to the fact that they've seen Floyd beat DLH and haven't seen Floyd and Shane in the ring together.

 

Last 5 fights:
Shane: 4-1
Oscar: 1-4

 

double post

 

I'd favor Floyd over both of them very comfortably, but I think De La Hoya presents more of a problem because of his height, range, and jab.

 

Shane, but by a small margin - neither DLH or Shane at this point in their career pose a Big threat in my eyes. I'd say its Shane by a 5% margin.

 

I also think stylistically that Shane is better for floyd, its just I still think he may have the power and technique necessary to land a MONSTER shot on floyd, and who knows what happens then.

 

Who was the last WW that Shane stopped? And who do you think hits harder, Shane or Oscar?

 

Shane based on style.

But I don't give him the advantage over Floyd.

 

Its been a while for shane - antonio diaz or maybe adrian stone? I could be wrong - he stopped vargas at like 150+ i know, but obviously thats not WW


Right now I definitely think shane hits considerably harder than DLH

 

DLH hands down...Shane gets boxed silly due to lack of defense and ring IQ..and shane has no jab and his footwork aint there no more(he couldnt cut off the ring aganist cotto)..he's a one handed fighter at this point with no jab at all...you need a jab to be competitve with pbf

 

BTW ramshall i like how you ran out the other thread and didnt defend you point

 

he wasnt tired against cotto?...around rd 4 and 5 he was holding and breathing heavy all the while getting tagged