Bigger threat to Fraud? Shane or DLH???

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Ramshall1, Feb 12, 2008.


  1. randeris

    randeris Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,339
    0
    Nov 20, 2007
    ramshall: "who gets more tired in the last 5 years?":patsch
     
  2. Ramshall1

    Ramshall1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,838
    0
    May 16, 2007
    I already have, you should try reading my posts first.
     
  3. Shane

    Shane Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,645
    0
    Jul 28, 2007
    There are both over the hill in my view, While Shane i think might present a more completive fight for Floyd i think Shane and DLH both have lost the hunger to be what they once where.
     
  4. Ramshall1

    Ramshall1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,838
    0
    May 16, 2007
  5. randeris

    randeris Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,339
    0
    Nov 20, 2007
    i agree that Shane will pose bigger problems, because of his mixed speed and power, and his ability to box and fight.. His speed will do a big difference, meaning he will be able to catch Mayweather, unlike De La Hoya.
     
  6. Symphenyceo

    Symphenyceo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,778
    40
    Nov 16, 2007
  7. Symphenyceo

    Symphenyceo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,778
    40
    Nov 16, 2007

    shane is not a better boxer than dlh...shane has no jab and no defense..yea he has the ability to fight but he was never a "boxer"..also shanes speed has diminshed alot..he was beat to the punch by cotto all fight
     
  8. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    Ramshall loves the ****, note he's always talking about some guys balls.
     
  9. KO Boxing

    KO Boxing Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,055
    4
    Apr 30, 2006
    Shane, but not by so much (and mainly because Floyd hasn't fought him yet, so there's the "unknown").

    Considering Floyd would earn possibly an extra $10m fighting Dela Hoya, I can see why he made that choice.

    Either or, both aren't TOO much of a threat to Floyd, these days. I think Cotto's his biggest threat outside of 154 pounders and above, and I see him (Cotto) losing a mid-to-wide decision. Even though its all about styles, I can't see Shane doing much better. And we all know what happened with DLH last time, which I think is gonna get worse the next time.

    What's the underlying point that's trying to be proven in this threat? That Floyd chooses the path of least resistance again, or is it that Floyd's W over Oscar is not as good as Cotto's W over Shane? Or maybe it's a bit of both, mixed with a couple of other little underlying points (which I would love to know)?

    :D
     
  10. Ramshall1

    Ramshall1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,838
    0
    May 16, 2007
    You suck off Fraud like youre on his payroll, do you at least charge extra when you perform the "Rusty Trombone".
     
  11. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004

    There you go again, talking about a guys ****.
     
  12. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,558
    18,245
    Oct 7, 2006
    Dude you're living in the Pre Forrest Mosley days. The Mosley you're talking about hasn't been seen since Adrian Stone.
     
  13. daprofessor

    daprofessor da legendary professor Full Member

    12,240
    14
    Sep 1, 2007
    28 ppl voted for dlh!? wtf!? those are the same knuckleheads that will buy the next ppv. suckers.
     
  14. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    3
    Jul 19, 2004
    Castillo wasn't a better boxer, nor was he a jabber with great defense. You seem to be stuck oin this criteria of who gives Floyd a tougher fight, but it doesn't seem to be based on anthing tangible.

    You also aren't taking into consideration activity, which can greatly effect a fighters fight.

    Aside from a fight w/ Vargas and Mayorga, DLH has NOT looked very good in a LONG time. And he does tire out.
     
  15. RealIzm

    RealIzm Boxing Junkie banned

    12,032
    2
    Oct 12, 2007
    At least the majority still have their wits