Biggest difference between Boxing and UFC.

UFC is a company not a sport !!!!!!

If all boxers had the same promotor sure then the one promotor could make any match he wanted but the top line boxers wouldnot earn a fraction as they do now

 

That's because the UFC is company and therefore all of the fighters are subject to the decisions by the company president.

Boxing is a sport composed of different sanctioning bodies, different fighter's with different promoters, and different managers. All of the people have to agree in order for fightds to be made which makes it a lot harder to make matches than it is in the UFC.

 

Boxing was like that before, now its become what it is because fighters get a freehand on whom to fight, they get paid too much and they brag about being the crash cows of the sport. Put a limit to what they earn and we'll probably get better match ups.

 

Actually the same thing does happen in MMA (UFC is one company within MMA).

Fans have been calling for Fedor against Couture for years but because they are promoted by different companies it has never happened.

 

It's not WWE dude.
Fighters need to fight.

 

biggest difference is talent and entertainment

I cant watch UFC for more than one round

However, very technical boxing matches with very little hitting, intrest me much more than a ufc "war"

 

Good point but lets try to stay postive we got the Super 6, Marquez-Vasquez IV, Mosley-Mayweather and Martinez-Pavlik.

 

Not that many good white american boxers in Boxing,

Plenty of white american mixed martial artist in UFC/MMA

White America, just like every other race, supports their own people. UFC just happens to have more white americans on the scene.

 

The UFC does make better matchups...who cares if its a business or a sport...still better matchups...

 

This.

 

there are seventeen weight divisions with great boxers in each, stop worshiping the small elite and you'll see.

the biggest difference is that in boxing a professional wrestler wouldn't get a title fight in his fourth bout.

 

Who cares? Anyone who wants to see a vaild comparison and can see through comparing apples with oranges for the sake of getting a spurious answer probably cares.

Look at it like this:

Top Rank is a company. They have/had four world-class welters: Cotto, Clottey, Margarito and (now) Pac.

Cotto's fought Clottey, Pac and Margarito.
Clottey's fought Cotto, Margarito and Pac.
Margarito's fought Clottey and Cotto.
Pac's fought Clottey and Cotto.

If you were idiotic enough to think that Top Rank was boxing, you'd probably be on some other board claiming that "Top Rank make all the best match-ups". Whereas we all know that three of the very best welters don't even work for Top Rank.

See. The point only seems to make sense when you start excluding all the valid information that contradicts the argument.

 

This and this alone is the biggest thing hurting boxing.


Everyone wants to see Pac-Floyd. No one pays attention to the other fights that are just as good with fighters that are just as dynamic.