Biggest HYPEJOB of 2011 ?

Cinamon will get his fragile chin exposed surely before too long.

 

haye

 

Adamek
BigReg

Knocked around Philly's finest...OH BOY!!!

 

How is Berto a hypejob? Almost everyone acknowledges him as a protected titlist that hasn't proved much and the only person here that hypes him is ONE poster though I forgot his name. I think he was being sarcastice anyways lol.

Say what you want to about Froch's fight results(arguably lost to Dirrell and the Kessler fight could've gone either way) but he has fought solid names and will continue to do so unlike some undefeated fighters who take minimum risks. Unfortunate that Froch lost his 0 but it was to Kessler in a close fight and I'd rather he fight the best and have a loss opposed to cherry picking bums and rarely fighting good names. I like Bute and am a fan but I easily have Froch & Ward ahead of him.

Adamek? Seriously? Everyone thinks he'd get killed against a Klitschko but admire his heart & desire to fight them.

Khan beats Kotelnik and Malignaggi and proves his chin doubters wrong by facing a big puncher again in Maidana and he's a hypejob?lol Some people on here.....

No hypejobs on that list imo although there will be those nuthuggers attatched to the big names(Floyd and Pacquiao for instance).

 

Adamek
Martinez

 

Says the dude who's still butt-hurt about his stretcher prediction.

This content is protected

 

BTW, I'm not saying Lemieux will be the next Tyson, but just that his situation right now is very similar to Tyson's at the same stage of his career.

 

Berto

Solis?

 

khan,LARA, bute and pascal

 

haye

 

Haye

 

Someone who fights EVERYONE cannot be a hypejob by anyones standards.

Get Froch out of that list.

By the way, I voted Lemieux.

 

Not voting in that, no way Froch should be on the list, couple of the others are marginal, how you can call Froch a hype job and not even have Haye on the list I have no idea. Haye has the worst ratio of achievements in the ring to hype on this site that I can think of.

And no way did Dirrell do enough in the Froch fight to take the belt off the champion. He might have the skills to do it if he were to fight positively, but that was a seriously negative performance from him that should never win a title. Froch did not look great, but Dirrell came to nick a title, not win it.

As fans, we should be supporting fighters like Froch who have the balls to take on all-comers, knowing that they risk picking up a defeat or two along the way, rather than fighters who continuously think safety-first in their match-making. Boxing is supposed to be entertainment, after all. Froch fights get discussed endlessly on here - with fighters like Mayweather, Haye et al, all we talk about is the politics and the chat as the fights are often pretty disappointing. Even Khan is now stepping up and seeking to silence some critics (after the Prescott fight, who would have thought he would fight Maidana and Bradley for the world title in three fights?), so even Khan is marginal for that list, these days.

 

I would have voted Haye had that been an option, btw, sorry I forgot that in my rant, not used to ranting!