Biggest Joke of the World "title" belts/bodies

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Jacques81, Nov 27, 2024 at 11:49 PM.



Worst Sanctioning Body/Belts

  1. IBO

    2 vote(s)
    5.9%
  2. WBO

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. WBA

    18 vote(s)
    52.9%
  4. WBC

    1 vote(s)
    2.9%
  5. IBF

    2 vote(s)
    5.9%
  6. WBU

    5 vote(s)
    14.7%
  7. WBF

    3 vote(s)
    8.8%
  8. IBA

    3 vote(s)
    8.8%
  1. Jacques81

    Jacques81 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,435
    3,708
    Oct 13, 2016
    These sanctioning bodies have been getting worse and worse at the trinkets they give out.

    We all know it's a money grab.

    We will exclude all the intercontinental, Americas, Pan-Asia and hundreds of other little regional belts.

    Let's focus on the "World title" belts ....

    Let's start with the WBA...(Gravy train of Oqeundo, Charr and John Ruiz)

    -4 belts in one division..

    Regular champion
    Super champion
    Interim champion
    Gold champion

    -WBC has the vaunted "Silver" belt, interim, and regular

    -The IBF only has one belt, but the make their winners defend their belt in 2 weeks or they automatically strip them, to only get 2 other fighters to put up fees to fight for it sooner. Crooks...

    -WBO seems okay. They do interim I think too.

    -WBF... I think James Toney won the HW version of this title at 48, lol
     
    Last edited: Nov 28, 2024 at 12:10 AM
    Ice8Cold likes this.
  2. MrPook

    MrPook Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,486
    2,235
    Apr 15, 2007
    IBF strips every legit Champion and ruins their undisputed status.
     
    Jacques81 likes this.
  3. destruction

    destruction Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,887
    12,121
    Mar 26, 2009
    The WBU is the biggest joke.

    Not only did it have champions who were not even European level, who made no defences of the belt.

    But it also no longer exists.

    It looks like it effectively went belly up around 2006-2007.

    Their last HW champion was Matt Skelton who made 0 defences of the belt, and the last CW champion was Mark Hobson who also made 0 defences of the belt.
     
    Jacques81 likes this.
  4. MaccaveliMacc

    MaccaveliMacc Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,576
    2,170
    Feb 27, 2024
    All of them are a sham. I'm not encouriging to just follow the lineage, as not everybody thinks it's a real thing, but if not the lineal championship, The Ring Magazine belt is the only one making sense.
     
    Jacques81 likes this.
  5. Wizbit1013

    Wizbit1013 Drama go, and don't come back Full Member

    12,652
    16,054
    Mar 17, 2018
    IBF actually treat boxing as somewhat of a sport and endorse mandatory fights rather than make crap up in order for a fighter to avoid them

    Without mandatory systems boxing would be broken even more
     
    Jacques81 likes this.
  6. The Professor

    The Professor Socialist Ring Leader Staff Member

    22,144
    15,410
    Sep 29, 2008
    Man tough choice. I picked the WBU. It's between them and the other obscure, unneeded bodies like WBF, IBO, & IBA.

    I've been following boxing for 45 years and never heard of any of these scams. It's bad enough we've got the "Big Four" (WBA, WBC, IBF, WBO)!!
     
    Jacques81 likes this.
  7. 46and0

    46and0 It's irrefutable. Full Member

    7,003
    121
    Dec 6, 2008
    Do you see Professor I C Chins these days? I hear he is still imparting his wisdom at the University of Lichtenstein in Germany!
     
    Jacques81 likes this.
  8. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    78,244
    18,525
    Sep 15, 2009
    WBA and it's not even close.

    WBC and IBF are the extremes in terms of enforcement so I understand both arguments.

    WBO no one gives a **** about.

    WBA have too many titles in each division, no consistency to their standards, and are widely regarded as a joke.
     
    Jacques81 likes this.
  9. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,033
    1,583
    Jan 6, 2024
    The WBU doesn't exist anymore and it was actually credible for a few years with Foreman and Toney.

    IMO WBU was better as an organization 5 in the 90s than the IBO is today.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_WBU_world_champions
     
    Last edited: Nov 28, 2024 at 1:01 PM
    Jacques81 likes this.
  10. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,033
    1,583
    Jan 6, 2024
    The WBO is the worst of the big 4 but the WBO is the only one that actually has a specific reason to exist. So its kind of a paradox there. IMO the big 4s credibility is a fluid thing thats changing and its often depends on division.

    IBO and WBF are currently 5 and 6 and WBU was 4th or 5th best during the 90s. So IBA has to be the worst one.
     
  11. catchwtboxing

    catchwtboxing Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,770
    30,058
    Jul 4, 2014
    Lately the WBA and IBA have been collaborating...scary!

    Seriously, the WBU or IBO absolutely has more credibility than these two cartels.
     
  12. Jacques81

    Jacques81 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,435
    3,708
    Oct 13, 2016
    LMAO
     
    catchwtboxing likes this.
  13. Jacques81

    Jacques81 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,435
    3,708
    Oct 13, 2016
    IBA sanctions the following championship bouts:

    World Title
    InterContinental Title
    Americas Title
    International Title
    Regional title : South Pacific, Caribbean, European, Latino , African , Middle East and Asian titles.
     
  14. JunlongXiFan

    JunlongXiFan 45-6 in Kirks Chmpionshp Boxing Predictions 2022 Full Member

    5,534
    5,958
    Aug 9, 2020
    WBO is the best. Good regional fairness and doesn't screw fighters over to protect champs. WBA is the worst
     
    Wizbit1013 and Jacques81 like this.
  15. JusABoxinFan

    JusABoxinFan Member Full Member

    476
    410
    Apr 20, 2022
    They pick and choose when to enforce mandatory bouts. No different from the other sanctioning bodies.
     
    Jacques81 likes this.