Ok, which robbery (if you believe them to be robberies, if not we all respect different opinions) is worst for you. DLH-Trinidad or DLH-Mosely II? On a side note, shouldn't have Paul given Quintana the rematch like Quintana gave it to him, instead of fighting at middleweight? EDIT: The thread is which of these two fights do you feel to be a worst robbery. It's not about the worst robbery in boxing's history. Sorry for the confusion people :good
Neither DLH-Trinidad nor DLH-Mosley 2 come within galaxies of being the worst robbery ever. The worst robbery ever is Juan Coggi-Eder Gonzalez I. Among really bad decisions from the judges, Lewis-Holyfield I and Escalera-Everett were really, really terrible.
I think he means, which are worst out of these two. I think the Trinidad fight on paper, although Oscar should have known better than that, really.
Neither DLH-Trinidad nor DLH-Mosley 2 were that bad, although I thought DLH won both fights narrowly. Steroids aside, I'd say DLH-Trinidad, because the rounds were closer in the Mosley rematch.
You go to a close decision with a guy, the door is open for a rematch. You KO a guy inside a round, is isn't.
The biggest robbery I seen was Steve Forbes vs D.Hopkins, Forbes definitely won the fight and he was robbed blind.
The classic point, and with reason. That's a very good point. But really for the guy Paul ended up fighting, why didn't he just give Quintana the rematch he's been asking for. At least Quintana has a win over Williams, and just like Williams feels that he had a bad night, Quintana feels like he just got caught early.
DLH/Trinidad was worse than DLH Mosely II IMO....that "gave away the championship rounds" people always say is bull****. He was on his feet boxing, and still landed more than Tito...just being the agressor shouldn't win you rounds. its called "effective aggression". DLH/Trindad has my vote and I was routing for Trindad by the way.
If I had to choice between the two: Tito - Oscar Wouldn't call it a robbery - per say - but I had Oscar winning that fight.
John john molina vs De la hoya,robbery. John john Molina vs Roberto GarcĂa robbery, Arce vs Rojas, robbery, Jorge Arce quitted and didnt want to fight anymore and complained about a legal blow. cotto vs canelo robbery!! LA PORTE VS CHAVEZ THE BIGGEST ROBBERY. All robberies!!! Chavez didn't want give La Porte a rematch,Oscar DE LA HOYA and Robert Garcia didn't want to give Molina a rematch, Arce didn't want to give Rojas a rematch.
From my memory i thought they were both very close but was still shocked odh got the short end BOTH times, I think I even had him winning the ssm2 fight more clear than the tito fight. Tito landed far more than he was getting credit for. But other, being the huge name made the decision surprising
DLH coasted in the late rounds vs Trinidad to make the closer than it should have been. I thought DLH did enough to win, but not a robbery. DLH-Mosley II. Again close fight. Close doesn't mean robbery. I thought DLH won.
I thought Oscar had beaten both 8-4.. But the biggest robbery I've ever seen, was Casamayor vs Santa Cruz. Horrible decision.