He hasn't shown much. Have you ever heard of foresight? What did Andy Rice Pudding Jr show in the 2 years prior to him beating your beloved Joshua all over the ring? Sporting success is not simply the result of linear progression. I rate Alvarez highly, but I definitely don't think he's some unbeatable phenomenon. In my book, he's had 4 losses. He looked pitiful against the ghost of Kovalev. I give Saunders a chance, if he does have the stamina, to outbox Alvarez to a UD loss, as stated. That doesn't mean I think he will win, or won't be stopped. As I've previously said, I think Saunders might have a questionable chin, and I see him getting stopped before I see Alvarez legitimately outboxing him to a decision. Is that so unreasonable? Does it merit being branded as someone with a "fetish for pikeys"? It seems highly unfashionable to say anything less than arselicking Alvarez, actually, but I'm not afraid of going against the grain. I'd say that the forum has a fetish for Alvarez before I do for "pikeys".