Blatant robbery has just occurred again ... local boxer shafted ...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Боксёр, Dec 18, 2009.


  1. Боксёр

    Боксёр Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,150
    162
    Dec 8, 2008
    Carl Dilks vs Charles Adamu ... anybody else watched this on Sky Sports 2 ? BRUTAL
     
  2. curly

    curly Fastest hands in the West Full Member

    2,007
    1
    Nov 29, 2008
    yup, seen worse though
     
  3. Боксёр

    Боксёр Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,150
    162
    Dec 8, 2008
    We all did but Adamu was WAY OFF with everything he did due to the ring rust .
     
  4. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    in boxing the judges are horrible...FACT
     
  5. Боксёр

    Боксёр Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,150
    162
    Dec 8, 2008
    Any bum off the street would judge better than the paid judges .
     
  6. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    52
    Sep 8, 2007
    you damn right about the paid part
     
  7. andyZOR

    andyZOR Obsessed with Boxing banned

    17,049
    2
    Feb 28, 2007
    the judges probably fell asleep cause of the bordedom of that fight hence the poor score cards.

    did you also see that one judge who gave Vidoz 3 rounds over Sosnowski? :lol:

    Not saying it s robbery, but its laughable.
     
  8. king s

    king s Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,912
    1
    Jan 7, 2009
    Do u know the name of the judge that had vidoz winning because there must be somthing up with that.And yeah dilks won that fight for sure but what aload of sh*t that was.
     
  9. andyZOR

    andyZOR Obsessed with Boxing banned

    17,049
    2
    Feb 28, 2007

    LOL no the judge didnt have Vidoz winning, the judge had Vidoz winning

    3 ROUNDS

    I thought Sosnowski blew him out 12-0. 11-1 is a fair assumption as well but kinda pushing it. But 3 rounds? lol please...
     
  10. Боксёр

    Боксёр Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,150
    162
    Dec 8, 2008
    117-111 ... but atleast not for Vidoz , LMAO