Pac overwhelms opposition so bad he's able to look bad and get away with it. He's been blowing the competition over, and thus is granted a much greater room for error when the fights are a complete whitewash. He's not the most refined fighter ever, either, but most know that obviously. The 1-2 mixing feet was kind of bad in the Mosley fight but that stuff happens... he got off balance.
^^^ a lot in this world is easier said than done! especially in boxing! actually hatton though pacquio is an easy fight! margarito thought pacquio is too small, cotto though he could bully pacquio, oscar though.... after the pac vs pbf... .i will add el terrible though....:rofl
Horse****. He'll do with Pac whatever he wants to do. The chances of him getting tagged are just greater.
Not true at all....PAC has beaten MANY intelligent fighters and the only one who gave him any problems was JMM....aside from his early losses of course.
:good AMEN the truth was told ! and this is what everyone knows already. even *******s and floyd haters.
Pac lost twice to Marquez, and he lost to a fading Morales in Morales' last stand against an elite type of opponent. The MAB fight was Pac's only win against a truly capable fighter with "know how." Check that, even Cotto to a lesser extent may classify as Pacquiao beating a capable boxer. .....but note that the two boxer/punchers Pac beat were fighters reliant on using mainly their left hand. Both MAB and Cotto had poor right hands, and the right hand is the one weapon thats kryptonite to southpaws. Both Marquez and Morales have great right hands. Point blank, to beat a physical dynamo you have to have both the skills and the know how to do it. None of Pacquiao's welter opponents meet that criteria. Cotto was the closest, but like I mentioned, his right hand is not much to speak of and he had also suffered an earlier beatdown at the hands of Margarito that did'nt help him any vs Pacquiao. What happens to physical dynamo's when they meet skill, know how, and class????? Go over to youtube and catch Evander Holyfield's disection of Mike Tyson. I'll note that that version of Holyfield was aging and like today's version of JMM, not many gave him a chance to even make it past the earlly rounds...... Look at the results when true skill and know how meets a physical dynamo........ Real skill will usually chop physical freaks down to size... .....yes, thats a fact!yep
Pac beat JMM twice but only got credit for the 2nd fight. EM was so shot yet in 2011 he's beating or competing top 140 lbers. Amazing! Someone should tell Erik he's shot because he obviously didn't get the memo. MAB and Miguel.....like DLH, Marg, Hatton, Josh and Shane were all two foster fighters....not like Pac but they weren't anything close to one demensional. Grant it....the were not like JMM or Floyd with the right but Shane has a nasty right hand. I agree that Floyd fits the bill as the type of fighter who can beat Pac but using the Tyson vs Holy comparison won't help you stance.....that wasn't a prime Mike...nor was it a polished Mike after being released from prison. But you're right about skills usually pay the bills against a offensive force....but Pac is operating on a different plateau...like a prime Mike.
Does it really matter how many punches Pac misses. The few that lands or will land on Floyd is what will matter. It will all depend on how Floyd takes those few shots. Don't tell me Pac will not land a single shot at Floyd in the fight. Don't worry kid, I still have Floyd winning against Pac.