I still think you're a racist ****, but I wanted to diffuse the situation. It's called being the bigger man. Something you wouldn't know much about seeing as you're a female. :hi:
The point is still worth noting, here's some basic deductive reasoning for ya: If the main reason for Floyd's extenuation to June is to make this so-called megafight, and if "the lil fella" is available in late May,...(dun, dun, dun) then it stands to reason that he can get out of the May 5th date if it really is the "lil fella" he wants to fight. Is that too reasonable or are you gonna stick with Floyd can only fight in May 5th?
Understand, but another poster answered that PBF got the May 5th okayed by the judge due to the fact to honor the contract. If that is the case. Listen, Arum is a snake just like King is. Is that Arum has the fighters now and King does not. If it was King, he would have put the fight together already. Like some said, let's wait to see what Pac states and we all can take it from there. I am going to say Pac will want the fight especially with all this news nonsense. I hope.
as i've said, pac-jmm3 is fully packed at MGM. they will do the same for pac-floyd easily even with prices 3 or 5 times of that. why not get this fight in a bigger stage? pac-floyd could easily fill a 40k capacity place.
Thats a good idea but Floyd already has the May 5 date. Nice excuse by Arum though. BTW LOL at the Bob The Builder ****.
The whole point of the postponement was to honor the contract with MGM. If he decides not too and goes with Bob the builder's idea, well then, he might be in serious trouble. It's seriously not worth it when Bob, before today, said Manny would be ready in April or May, that was, when he thought Mayweather would be in prison.
Manny apologists going to extreme levels. It's clear as friggin daylight that his camp don't want the fight.
So what would prevent MGM to do its own kind of extenuation to some later May date? Wouldn't they rather have Floyd fight Pac? It makes financial sense, have two Mexicans fight in the 5th than build a temporary stadium to stage the fight of the century a couple of weeks later. So why wouldn't it be worth it? And what are you a mind reader? Bob also said he's amenable to a Floyd fight in late May, isn't this what this whole thread is all about?
Just saying, if in fact he was let go to make that May 5th contracted date, you think the judge is going to okay another date a couple of weeks later? She will be laughed at as a judge. Remember, he is a criminal for beating on a woman.
There is such a thing as due process. Of course if Floyd wants to get out of that date he has to appear before the judge and explain why. Now, you think the judge really gives a **** if the date is the 5th or the 25th? It's not the date of the fight that is important, if it was then she would've mandated Floyd go to a jail directly after May 5th. It's more logical to assume thatMay 5th is just an arbitrary number...and was more than likely just the judge accommodating Floyd's contractual obligation to MGM(on that date).
Let's put it this way, what's easier? Arum/Pacquiao agreeing to May 5th or Mayweather pleading to judge as to why his sentence should be postponed AGAIN.