Bob Arum not even trying or mentioning Floyd-Cotto.

you missed the point kid...

you root for floyd cause he's undefeated and it's easy......just like rooting for the patriots this year when you've never seen a game in your life (not you, just an example)

and i aint about to prove **** by going through all your silly posts....i know what i saw and i'm cool with that....i aint trying to make you look like a liar, or stupid......you actually do a pretty good job yourself....

and i remember in that thread, it was just me, you and your man scar debating....and i know damn well you weren't quoting him, **** you'll get spanked for that.....

 

No I was not!

This is where it started and SSM and DLH are not equal in value:nono I maintain that SSM by virtue of two wins and overall record is the better fighter. i'm not sure how you are getting Cotto's comp involved in the discussion between SSM and DLH. If any of it was confusing, my apologies but Cotto's comp has nothing to do with it other than he did indeed fight at least 1 live WW.

Stylistically? Wright would tax Tito every time. the only problem is Wright didnt fight at 47 so we'll never get a true prime for prime sense but you did have a prime for prime match between DLH and SSM and mosely waxed that ass.

Vernon? The version that beat SSM twice was a BAD muther. Unfortunately, Tito was out of 47 by then.
Forrest was too slick and skilled, IMO and Tito would have gotten the same treatment as SSM.

I dont see the huge disparity in comp between DLH and SSM and mosley is the better fighter. I mean even now? Oscar has really only won one fight since 2003(You know damn well he only got the Sturm decision to keep the Hops fight alive). If someone asked me which career I'd rather have? I'd take SSM every damn time. I dont see how anyone can say DLH is his equal, he's clearly INFERIOR to me.

 

I was simply commenting on your comment about Cotto's win over Mosley and PBF's win over DLH not being equal.

As far as their competition, DLH and Mosley, perhaps another thread for that. I don't want to hijack this one. Mosley didn't wax DLH at 147. He beat him 7-5 in a close but clear fight. As for Forrest, was he bad? Yes, he certainly was. Better than Trinidad? Not IMO. I can't see him beating Trinidad, not with him being concerned about his power.

 

Yeah...arguing w/ Eze is like arguing w/ Bigtime9. Neither know WTF they are even posting about. they repleat **** they heard and **** on Floyd's possible opponents.

Just pointless.

 

I said

Again, if SSM is the better fighter, the value in beating him CANNOT BE EQUAL to beating Fishnets:nono I dont see either of us changing our perspectives. In my mind? SSM is clearly the better fighter and head to head goes further in determining that, than who DLH fought.

As for Tito? Before the shoulder problems Vernon wouldn't have been too concerned. Look at how easily he dominated Shane. Tito(again i was ahuge fan of his at 47) had problems with DLH's boxing ability and would have lost UD to vernon as far as i can see it:good

 

Mtthyse and Mitchell. . . :rofl :rofl :rofl

Got any more jokes.


My point IS that Margarito is a top WW and a damn good fighter - you are the one who cant bare to say it. Why is that?

 

Simple. Margarito made Floyd look bad for about a year having him turn down CAREER paydays. You should knopw by now, Mayweather fanboys are automatically haters of anyone who's a possible threat.

 

NO matter what PBF accomplishes . . . it will remain on the books that he ducked Margarito once. :yep

 

once you duck someone, its hard to "undo" it.

 

Yet, he's the biggest win on PW's resume and you think PW is a bigger threat than Shane.

PW barely beat him and took more of a beating in that win. Again, you simply cannot have it both ways. You have to be wrong one way or the other. It seems obvious you are wrong in your assessment of AM, but you cant admit it cause that would in turn expose that you were wrong when you suggested AM was never worthy of a fight with Fraud.

You have painted yourself into a corner, but thats what happens when you blindly support a coward.

 

You hate him partially because of how he throws a punch?atsch

If he is so bad, why has it been only recent that he lost? And please, don't just say his opponents were that bad. Unless you've SEEN his opponents, or even their fights w/ Margarito, you shouldn't comment.

Margarito beat SEVERAL guys who at the time where Ring ranked in the top 10 (if not sue, me, this is from memory)...
CLottey
Kyvelos
Antonio Diaz
Lewis
Cintron

It's easy NOW to try and say they all sucked if you want. But that wasn't how they were percieved before. And them NOT being as good as Mayweather doesn't make em suck either. But he beat them, and he beat them in style, just the way you would expect a top fighter to dispatch of them. He doesn't struggle with journeyman like Zab has on several occasions.

We know why you really hate him. Because He and Arum tried to make a fight w/ the best fighter in the world. All he's done is stay in shape betweem fights, not be a total dick, and fight whoever he can.