I know most of you didn't buy the fight but Gray just interviewed Bennett, he stated, "Mayweather did nothing wrong, he violated no WADA protocols, NSAC has no interest in an investigation, it is a non issue, non story"
The PPV telecast, there is no link unless a site publishes the story ... But I'm sure they won't, they only want controversy
Here is a news flash I didn't hide the fact that I used an IV at my house with out the permission of nsac or WADA or even USADA I did not use 750 ml of fluid for " rehydration " I did not try to gran stand regarding PED accusations against someone with out this much proof ! So next time you use that childish term hater know the facts Floyd is using masking agents the only reason he got a TUE is because he was dirty with out that exemption his tests would have came back positive and there would have been huge penalties .. No one is desperate but his supporters trying to discredit one of all people someone who is as credible as Hauser while also believing a hypocrite in Mayweather .
Until Bennet can answer the following I won't believe a word they say when they did t even know about the IVnand it was USADA that gave the TUE and not NSAC ! Hey Flo mos answer the pt below http://www.thesweetscience.com/news/articles/21415-hauser-fires-at-usada-and-floyd-usada-responds No amount of self-serving rhetoric from USADA can change the following unrebutted facts: (1) The IV was administered at Floyd Mayweathers home after the weigh-in on May 1. USADA learned about the IV on that date. (2) The 2015 WADA Prohibited Substances and Methods List states, Intravenous infusions and/or injections of more than 50 ml per 6 hour period are prohibited except for those legitimately received in the course of hospital admissions, surgical procedures, or clinical investigations. (3) The above-referenced prohibition is in effect at all times that the athlete is subject to testing. It exists because, in addition to being administered for the purpose of adding specific substances to a persons body, an IV infusion can dilute or mask the presence of another substance that is already in the recipients system or might be added to it in the near future.:happy (4) Mayweather-Pacquiao was contested on May 2. (5) Mayweather applied for a the****utic use exemption on May 19 (seventeen days after the fight). (6) USADA granted the the****utic use exemption on May 20 (eighteen days after the fight). (7) USADA did not notify the Nevada State Athletic Commission about the IV until May 21 (nineteen days after the fight). Meanwhile, on May 2 (fight night), Manny Pacquiaos request to be injected with Toradol (a legal substance) to ease the pain caused by a torn rotator cuff was denied by the Nevada State Athletic Commission because the request was not made in a timely manner. It would be helpful if Travis Tygart or his spokesperson answered the following questions directly: (1) What was the medical justification and supporting data that led to USADA granting the the****utic use exemption for an otherwise prohibited IV procedure? (2) On how many occasions has the A sample of a professional boxer tested by USADA come back positive for a prohibited substance? (3) What was the testosterone-to-epitestosterone ratio for each urine test administered to Floyd Mayweather by USADA for each of his fights beginning with Mayweather vs. Shane Mosley up to and including Mayweather vs. Andre Berto (4) Does USADA still maintain that it handled the Erik Morales matter correctly?[/QUOTE] Bump
Disappointing but is it really surprising? NSAC and USADA proved in the scandal that they protect Mayweather. Why would they do anything different now?