Bob Fitzsimmons Appreciation Thread

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Seamus, May 13, 2010.


  1. Boilermaker

    Boilermaker Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,372
    475
    Oct 6, 2004
  2. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,088
    3,779
    Sep 14, 2005
  3. Boilermaker

    Boilermaker Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,372
    475
    Oct 6, 2004
  4. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,242
    Sep 15, 2009
    who do you rate in that position.
     
  5. mattdonnellon

    mattdonnellon Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,788
    2,129
    Dec 2, 2006
  6. apollack

    apollack Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,317
    1,913
    Sep 13, 2006
    These were not official fights, but rather 4-round sparring exhibitions. It is true that Dooley did better and was considered to be the superior fighter at that time. However, Dooley was a heavyweight, whereas Fitz was a small middleweight, more of a welterweight by today's standards.
     
  7. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,874
    52,018
    Mar 21, 2007
    Yeah, I wonder if Fitz could have squeezed himself down to 135 at this point with modern rules and weight-making? To terrifying to consider really...
     
  8. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,478
    Sep 7, 2008
    I've had the same thoughts but of Welter.

    His legs would look shocking at Lightweight though :lol: He'd make Ali Funeka look like Naseem Hamed!
     
  9. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    411
    Jan 22, 2010
    B, I truly think that to really appreciate Bob Fitzsimmons, it should be
    ]"required' reading for ESB posters, to read the great take on Ruby Robert, by a man who SAW Bob Fitzsimmons fight many times, and all the following champions til after Joe Louis. He was the great American poet
    Edgar Lee Masters,who wrote an aricle in "The Book Of Boxing", by Heinz and Ward. Page 228...It will enlighten you !
     
  10. Boilermaker

    Boilermaker Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,372
    475
    Oct 6, 2004
    The middleweight limit was only 150 at the time, and only a year or two earlier, Fitz had actually won the NZ lightweight championship so I think you are definitely correct with the welterweight call.

    I do also agree with the exhibition Calls, and you can never really know how serious they are, but i do think they are interesting. I would love to get a report on the Fitzsimmons Lees exhibition/ND.
     
  11. Boilermaker

    Boilermaker Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,372
    475
    Oct 6, 2004
    I am not sure if the link to that article is in this thread. I know there are a couple of good Edgren articles in there, but i havent read the book you are referring to.
     
  12. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    72,021
    28,050
    Feb 15, 2006
  13. Rasch

    Rasch Guest

    Was Dooley a heavyweight in these matches against Fitz? I thought they were close in weight at this time?
     
  14. apollack

    apollack Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,317
    1,913
    Sep 13, 2006
    Fitz likely weighed around 150 pounds; possibly less. Dooley was more along the lines of 170-175; possibly more. At that point, Fitz was boxing as a middleweight, whereas Dooley was taking heavyweight fights. Actually, at that point, the middleweight limit was 11 stone, or 154 U.S. pounds. Fitz was easily making the middleweight limit. The middleweight limit was only later moved up to 158 pounds. That was where it remained for quite some time, not the 160 we think of today. And these guys had to make weight the day of the fight, not the day before. Sometimes they even had to make it immediately before the fight, depending on the contract.
     
  15. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,478
    Sep 7, 2008
    Yeah, it was 11 stone when Fitz was champ'. Definitely would've been at least a Welter today with a day to re-hydrate.