His style is weird as hell and he did vary it. I agree with trap-smith. Although I always think of Fitzsimmons as a tank. Fairly static but looks to pick targets carefully with big punches, when being attacked keeps his cool and looks to slot one home, but can be overrun, if he does not get his shots off. I also think he could change and be abit more aggresive and force his opponents to make mistakes then counter them, like what he did with Dempsey. I could see Griffith out-working him though.
Fitz may have competed in a substandard era with a lesser standard, without better footage of the era its impossible to tell, but it is likely. Tiger had his limitatations in his own era but looks to be technically more sound, much busier and looked to be in better physical condition. Without good footage of Fitz any thoughts are pure guess work
Prime Ryan and that Dempsey are not one and the same, and they are rather different in my estimation anyway, but, in terms of how they would fight Fitz, you have to believe that Dempsey is a really good foil. And he got absolutley destroyed, i mean he wasn't in it. A one-sided thrashing. That doesn't translate all the way across, but I wonder, given how firmly Fitz out-boxed and out-generaled him with the added power gap...it doesn't add up particularly well for Ryan in my estimation. Furthermore, I was reading this morning about West-Ryan 3 (you posted in that thread in fact). What success West had seemed to be in forcing an eager Ryan to lead and taking what he had to give and countering - sounds familiar? It should, because it surmises the way Fitz fought aggressive fighters rather nicely. What spelt several rounds of domiantion for West might spell a sharp end for Ryan versus Fitz. But Ryan was superb and you never know. Just that my money would be on Fitz. I certainly didn't mean to apply that he was that, just that he traded on pressure and violence. The style advantage is firmly with Fitz here, as well as the physical advantages.
I like that too, based upon the HW run. If he didn't get KO'd he'd have a chance at a decision, I think. When we have one fighter generally dominating aggression (Assuming Griffith doesn't want to work that much on the inside or mix it up) AND there's only one fighter winning by KO though, I know where my money is going.
Any man can be ko'd, Tiger may well have been the best composite puncher and may have hit Fitz more than he'd ever been hit
It is very difficult to guage his pre HW style IMO, I think he refined his skills at HW really and before was slightly raw. I think on the inside both men would'nt look to fight and keep it away from the inside, Griffith because he doesnt want to get in their, and Fitz because he does more damage at range.
Fitz hit as hard as Foster in my estimation. Foster nearly killed Tiger. But then, this is a smaller version of Fitz who hadn't established himself as anything like the puncher he would become, so yeah, i'll accept your maybe. At the very least we agree that Tiger had an absolutley extraordinary chin.
I disagree with this. My impression of Fitz is that if anything he re-gressed as a technical fighter but sharpened a specific set of tools that worked for him up at the higher weights to become an overall more refined specialised machine. Yeah, it's a really weird one this because Griffith might be the better in-fighter...really rare in this type of cross-era match up. Either way, I wouldn't bet on it. Anyway, here, he doesn't want to be inside, for sure.
You make some good points. I want to add that Ryan also beat Dempsey in three. Fitz and Ryan fought an exhibition in the early 1890s. Do you have any newspaper reports or other reports on this. Could give us an indication how a real fight would unfold. Hm, Fitz was also beaten by pressure fighters and I think Walker wouldn't give him much room to work.
Demspey was actually pissed. Literally. No, I don't know it, but one thing that is interesting to me is that Ryan was instrumental in preparing Jeffries for Fitz, perhaps he had his number in some way? Although of course, Jeffries has an extra 70lbs to execute the strategy.
Very interesting, i think Fitz has the ability to stop his man, but Tiger has the ability to win the fight ie the exchanges. It's not as if Fitz' right hand is not potent here because Foster did it with the left, Tiger's not that kind of fighter who is only susceptible to one shot in the main. Fitzimmons might stop him late whilst trailing on the cards. I think the ability that Tiger has to counter with the heavy artillery sees him do well here though.
Really, I thought he was a much more physical fighter pre-HW days and relied more on his strength and physicality rather than his speed and technical ability. It is weird because the better inside fighter (Griffith) actually wants to be in his opponents danger zone (Fitzs- on the outside). To win.
Oh i don't doubt that this is true, I didn't mean to imply he was more physical at higher weights, the opposite in fact. Fitz wasn't big enough to fight these guys in the ways he learned coming up, becuase he was in consistantly with bigger men. Fighting at MW saw him enjoy certain advantages that became exclusively disadvantages when he moved up for the HW's. Fitz had to narrow his range. I'm sure that he became technically better than he was previously at the things he did, but in the same way Tyson was better technically than Liston - within a very narrow remit that he had to use to win fights due to physical limitations. Liston is a better technician because of his bigger breadth. Similar conundrum with Fitz. He's just one big enigma, really. The whole match up is baffling, actually.
Thing is in the Corbett fight he played a patient stalker and took his oppertunities when it comes. When he fights Jeffries he goes for him. How the **** you supposed to understand this guy? It really is.