Bob Fitzsimmons vs Joe Frazier

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by yancey, Aug 18, 2009.


  1. yancey

    yancey Active Member Full Member

    1,487
    58
    Nov 28, 2007
    Primes, of course.

    What happens?
     
  2. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    119
    Oct 9, 2008
    Frazier SMOKES Fitz quick and early........................... Cheers.....

    MR.BILL
     
  3. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,997
    28,008
    Feb 15, 2006
    I guess Frazier comes off the floor to win.
     
  4. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,973
    13,342
    Apr 1, 2007
    Foster/Frazier all over again, more then likely a more prolonged beating.
     
  5. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    279
    Jul 22, 2004
    Fitz apparently hit harder than Wlad, Lennox, Foreman, Tyson, Comits, Atom Bombs, and its rumoured a Fitz right hand created the universes initial big bang.

    Thus Fitz by first round decapitation with Fraziers head being thrust into orbit around the moon
     
  6. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,478
    Sep 7, 2008
    Frazier would stop him in the 1st round.
     
  7. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,997
    28,008
    Feb 15, 2006
    What world class fighter did Frazier ever stop in the first round?
     
  8. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,973
    13,342
    Apr 1, 2007
    Beat Foster within a inch of his life in one and a half. :lol:
     
  9. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,478
    Sep 7, 2008
    I don't agree that Fitzsimmons would be a World class fighter when compared to Frazier. He'd have less of a chance than Foster that's for sure.

    IN MY OPINION :good
     
  10. yancey

    yancey Active Member Full Member

    1,487
    58
    Nov 28, 2007
    ;)
     
  11. yancey

    yancey Active Member Full Member

    1,487
    58
    Nov 28, 2007
    I agree with the feeling that Frazier would get Bob pretty quick, but just wanted to see what others thought.
     
  12. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,249
    5,941
    Apr 30, 2006
    Frazier, early and ugly I'd imagine.
     
  13. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,997
    28,008
    Feb 15, 2006
    It anoys me somewhat when people bring up Bob Foster to justify that the top heavyweights of the 70s would have steamrolled great lightheavyweigts from other eras.

    Foster didnt just get beaten by the Ali's and Fraziers he also got beaten by the kind of second teir heavyweights that the top light heavyweights of the 50s had been able to deal with while far past their best.

    He was a great light heavyweight but just not a viable heavyweight.

    Now Fitzsimmons had been anihilating the best heavyweights of his era yet people are not willing to credit him with being able to do better than Bob Foster against the heavyweights of the 70s?
     
  14. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,478
    Sep 7, 2008
    I didn't mean it like that. I was actually saying that because Foster would've been light years ahead of Fitz as well (in punching power I think Foster would've beaten most of Fitz's opponents as well) and he fared badly against, as you say, even middling heavys.

    I appreciate the innovation, just not it's chances of standing up today. Hope that explains my point-of-view, I'm certainly interested in the pre-war fighters, no doubt.
     
  15. OBCboxer

    OBCboxer Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,954
    230
    Jun 2, 2007
    Frazier KO1 or KO 2. No disrespect to Fitzsimmons as he is a great fighter but he simply would be overpowered.