Bob Fitzsimmons Vs Marvin Hagler

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by BitPlayerVesti, Jul 15, 2018.


  1. BitPlayerVesti

    BitPlayerVesti Boxing Drunkie Full Member

    8,581
    11,093
    Oct 28, 2017
    Couldn't see a thread for this for some reason.
     
  2. Mark Adam

    Mark Adam Active Member banned Full Member

    837
    254
    Jul 4, 2018
    I feel Hagler`s reach would be a problem for Bob, it would make it hard for him to land or counter without getting countered but Fitz knocked bigger men and that could be a factor, Hagler would have struggled with the heavies that Bob beat.
     
  3. VegasMichael

    VegasMichael New Member Full Member

    7
    5
    Jul 11, 2018
    A KO phenom(Bob) against a guy known for his tough chin(Hagler). I looked through Bob's record and noticed he was KO'ed 4 times; however, that was twice to James Jeffries who we know was no slouch and once to Jack Johnson, nor was he a slouch. Also to Bill Lang but that was near the end of Bob's career. Fitzsimmons vs Hagler sounds like a good war to me.
     
  4. Longhhorn71

    Longhhorn71 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,714
    3,475
    Jan 6, 2007
    One may have to assume Fitz hit harder that Hearns...being Hagler survived Hearns' power.

    And that the fight is at MW, being Fitz did move up in weight some, and Mavin didn't.
     
  5. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    32,306
    40,414
    Jan 8, 2017
    I don't know why,but I just see Marvin stopping Fitz here. Maybe Hagler having to come from behind to do so and having facial injury s .I'll go Hagler w ko 13
     
  6. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,032
    Sep 22, 2010
    I'd back Bob, he was a genius.
     
  7. Combatesdeboxeo_

    Combatesdeboxeo_ Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,991
    1,141
    Nov 19, 2016
    If both them are 160 in the ring then i go with marvin by ud, but bob was naturally bigger and stronger than hagler his frame was bigger without a doubt
     
    Longhhorn71 likes this.
  8. KernowWarrior

    KernowWarrior Bob Fitzsimmons much bigger brother. Full Member

    3,256
    3,668
    Jul 12, 2012
    Marvellous Marvin was one of all time favourites, however i say Fitz has his beating, Fitz had truly freakish power, though i sure would pay for a seat to watch these warriors lock horns, a chess match of defensive moves it not likely to be.
     
  9. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,243
    49,603
    Apr 27, 2005
  10. Reinhardt

    Reinhardt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,544
    20,085
    Oct 4, 2016
    This is sooo hard a pick, I like Fitz, if a war breaks out Fitz was much tougher than Hearns! He takes a brutal decision or stoppage on cuts
     
  11. Cecil

    Cecil Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,103
    5,245
    Mar 22, 2015
    Well if Hagler could stay out of trouble and make it a boxing match I think his greater all round game would win a fairly hard fought UD.
    However if Marvin got himself into a slugging match, despite even with his great chin the chances are he's being stopped, Fitzimmons had unreal power.
     
    Reinhardt likes this.
  12. Gudetama

    Gudetama Active Member Full Member

    1,042
    920
    Sep 11, 2017
    At middleweight I'd pick Hagler. Anywhere north of that, I'd pick Fitz.
     
  13. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    32,306
    40,414
    Jan 8, 2017
    Would be a war.
     
  14. SwarmingSlugger

    SwarmingSlugger Active Member Full Member

    1,360
    1,690
    Nov 27, 2010
    I think he definitely hit harder than Hearns. No disrespect to Tommy who had an atom bomb in that right hand, Fitz was just a freak even more so than Tommy. I pick Fitz here, as Marvin was a great middleweight but Fitzs power took out heavyweights.
     
  15. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,088
    3,779
    Sep 14, 2005
    Hagler TKO 6 Fitzsimmons