Bob Foster. In his prime at LHW...Who beats him?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by TheSouthpaw, Jul 25, 2012.


  1. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,132
    8,586
    Jul 17, 2009
    Like most,I see the likes of Charles,Moore,Tunney,and Greb beating him. I can't make up my mind about Bob and Spinks.
     
  2. jowcol

    jowcol Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,333
    838
    Jul 22, 2004
    Aw, **** on Spinks. :D Too many on board here IMO overrate him.
    You can talk all you want about the 80's crop of LH's but they just don't resonate with me.
    >Some of his 'name' wins were against fighters that had already been thru their share of wars.
    >and?....Eddie Gregory was clearly the better fighter! Michael beats the drained shriveled pear, Eddie's head demons send him down the river and Mike, as champ, feasts on a less then sterling crop of contenders, beats a lethargic old Holmes, and has nut-huggers calling him perhaps the greatest LH of all time. :huh
    My $0.02

    But he is a top ten ATG LHeavy.
     
  3. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,101
    15,581
    Dec 20, 2006
    For a post that makes no sense....that is $0.02 to much!
     
  4. DaveK

    DaveK Vicious & Malicious Full Member

    3,668
    35
    Mar 2, 2009
    :patsch
     
  5. WhyYouLittle

    WhyYouLittle Stand Still Full Member

    1,372
    21
    Jul 13, 2012
    Agreed. Jones would either be crushed or run all night while eating jabs.

    Foster was definitely top ten material. I don't see him going past Tunney, Loughran, Ezz, Archie or Conn though.

    I like Harold Johnson's chances against Bob too. Johnson was good at picking jabs, had a beautiful one himself, plus a good right that he rarely missed in an opening. I wouldn't count Bob out though. Harold could be stopped by a good one (like against Oakland Billy Smith, for example) and Foster had plenty of good ones.

    Spinks slickness could cause big trouble for Bob but I don't know if I'd necessarily favor him.

    It'd be interesting to see how Bob would do against Tommy Gibbons. Gibbons could be incredibly frustrating, but he prefered to neutralize the guy in close. I don't know if he could get by Foster's long and and accurate jab.
     
  6. TheSouthpaw

    TheSouthpaw Champion Full Member

    7,942
    61
    Jul 21, 2012
    Spinks has the best chance.
     
  7. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,733
    29,083
    Jun 2, 2006
    That might be the concensus , but I'm none to sure he gets past Tunney , Langford,or Greb.
     
  8. TheSouthpaw

    TheSouthpaw Champion Full Member

    7,942
    61
    Jul 21, 2012
    I heard that ****!!!!!!!!!!!!............
     
  9. TheSouthpaw

    TheSouthpaw Champion Full Member

    7,942
    61
    Jul 21, 2012
    I know right Dave...This dude has obviously been drinkin
     
  10. TheSouthpaw

    TheSouthpaw Champion Full Member

    7,942
    61
    Jul 21, 2012
    Foster, in his prime...was one of the toughest son of a bitches in the history of the LHW division
     
  11. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,585
    46,208
    Feb 11, 2005
    Maske has the style to defuse him, control distance, pace and the verdict.
     
  12. FlyingFrenchman

    FlyingFrenchman Active Member Full Member

    954
    12
    Sep 15, 2011
    Charles and Spinks

    Moore, Tunney, Jones, and a few others would have a good chance as well.
     
  13. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,850
    239
    Feb 19, 2012
    I assume, regarding the earlier poll, Seamus that you were the lone sane person who voted for Henry.
     
  14. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,553
    3,755
    May 4, 2012
    :patsch

    Foster fighting 35 year old Jones would win maybe.
     
  15. ThinBlack

    ThinBlack Boxing Addict banned

    4,768
    26
    Sep 18, 2007
    Charles, Moore, Pastrano, Spinks, and possibly Loughran.