Bob Foster v Jim Corbett and Bob Fitz

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mcvey, Jul 5, 2012.


  1. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,518
    28,722
    Jun 2, 2006
    Bob Foster the Praying mantis of the LHVY division, always came up short against the big class heavyweights that were his contemporaries.Ali Frazier,Terrell ect.

    How would he do against smaller lighter heavyweight champs of the past such as-----

    Bob Fitzsimmons 5'11.5"160-172lbs.

    This content is protected
    This content is protected


    Jim Corbett 6'1" 172-188lbs.

    This content is protected


    This content is protected


    Skinny Bob 6'3" 175-182lbs
    Against Ali below.





    This content is protected
    This content is protected



    15rds modern gloves.??????
     
  2. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,423
    26,895
    Feb 15, 2006
    He seesm to have prety much hit a brick wall past 175lbs, so I am not inclined to think that he would have beaten these guys.
     
  3. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    60,543
    44,409
    Feb 11, 2005
    The wall that lay beyond 175 was sterner in the 1970's by ten fold. I enjoy your role as foil, but sometimes it strains any laziest levels of credulity.
     
  4. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,423
    26,895
    Feb 15, 2006
    But Foster wasn't just loosing to the Ali's and Fraziers.

    He was also loosing to the Doug Jonses.

    It would not necesarily take a strong heavyweight division to cage his ambitions at 175.
     
  5. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,338
    Jun 29, 2007
    Foster did very poorly vs. heavyweights with moderate to good power. Foster said, the heavyweight jab, felt like the Light heavyweight knockout punch. I don’t think Foster could take much from Fitzsimmons, and would pick Fitz to win via KO with a head or body shot.


    Foster vs. Corbett would be interesting. If you believe Joe Choynski and Peter Jackson hit on Bob Fosters level, Corbett’s durability should be enough to weather an occasional hard shot from Foster as he went 80+ rounds with Choysnki and Jackson without being floored.


    Foster was tall, and long, but Corbett was kid quick with his hands and feet, and very hard to catch cleanly to the head. I see a very tactical type of match here, with Corbett winning a split decision.


    Foster is one of those all time greats who really did poorly when he moved up in class.
     
  6. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    261
    Jul 22, 2004
    Foster would knock out Fitz and Corbett. Foster was from the advanced pro-boxing era, Fitz and COrbett from the semi-pro amateur sport that was in it's infancy. That different in standards of performance would be very very telling

    It's a bit like expecting a 5 a side pub team to beat Barcelona, it's not going to happen
     
  7. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,423
    26,895
    Feb 15, 2006
    That is about the only argument that you could make for Foster.

    One based on there being zero points of equivalence between two eras.
     
  8. MMJoe

    MMJoe Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,844
    34
    Apr 23, 2009
    Bob Fitzsimmons vs Bob Foster would have been a cool fight, both are cut from the same cloth. Both had freakish power.
     
  9. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,423
    26,895
    Feb 15, 2006
    If he does that in a dream he better wake up and apologize!
     
  10. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,355
    43,377
    Apr 27, 2005
    Thank god for common sense.
     
  11. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,518
    28,722
    Jun 2, 2006

    " Common sense aint that common".
     
  12. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,518
    28,722
    Jun 2, 2006
    Jackson was not a a huge puncher and, had an injured ankle which affected his mobility against Corbett.

    Though Choynski and Corbett both had less than a handful of fights when they met Corbett had the benefit of daily coaching at the SF AC, compared to him Choynski was a rank amateur. Choynski too was only 20 when he fought Corbett and spotting him 20lbs in their first fight and, 8lbs in their second.
     
  13. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,423
    26,895
    Feb 15, 2006
    Any answer that hung on common sense, would have to acknowledge Fosters lack of sucess against fighters over 175lbs.

    Even if you think more highly of modern fighters, it should be obvious that this isn't going to be a walk in the park for him.
     
  14. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    261
    Jul 22, 2004
    Fitz isn't over 175, he's smaller than Foster, Corbett isn't nearly as big as the HWs Foster fought and is a very light hitter, so I don't see what issue his size is
     
  15. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,518
    28,722
    Jun 2, 2006
    I would agree with Janitor that Foster was a flop versus the top heavyweights, it's undeniable really.

    The reason I picked those I did as prospective opponents for Belting Bob was precisely,[ as you have pointed out ,]they are much smaller, and therefore more akin to Foster's own size.