Bob Foster vs Eddie Mustafa Muhammad

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Eye of Timaeus, Apr 26, 2020.


  1. Eye of Timaeus

    Eye of Timaeus Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,893
    1,189
    Sep 1, 2019
    I've got Eddie taking this one on points. I think his chin was top notch. Thoughts?
     
    Richard M Murrieta likes this.
  2. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,133
    25,315
    Jan 3, 2007
    I’m inclined to agree. Eddie Gregory was durable, skilled, and could punch. Of course it’s not easy to readily pick anyone at 175 lbs to beat Bob Foster, but Gregory is as good a candidate as any.
     
  3. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,340
    9,955
    Jun 23, 2008
  4. Richard M Murrieta

    Richard M Murrieta Now Deceased 2/4/25 Full Member

    22,635
    30,409
    Jul 16, 2019
    Prime Bob Foster, 1968-1974, wins this one by unanimous decision over Eddie Mustafa Muhammad. Eddie is a much better fighter than Ray Anderson. Eddie did last 15 rounds against WBA Light Heavyweight Champion Victor Galindez in 1977, losing a close decision in a bout that was marred by low blows by each. Bob would have to move and set up his combos behind his left jab. Mustafa was a very underrated boxer and he did pack a punch, which Foster would be very aware of before the bout. Mustafa would be able to withstand Foster's left hook that he would also be aware of prior to this fight, and Eddie has a very sound defense.
     
    Reinhardt likes this.
  5. Reinhardt

    Reinhardt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,984
    19,026
    Oct 4, 2016
    I really liked a focused Eddie and would pick him to beat a lot of good light heavyweights, but Bob belongs in the upper tier of ATG fighters at 175, Spinks , Charles and Moore .Eddie is a little less than those guys.
     
    Richard M Murrieta likes this.