Bob Foster vs. Gene Tunney/Max Schmeling

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Russell, Aug 24, 2008.


  1. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,650
    13,046
    Apr 1, 2007
    How does he do vs. both at his absolute peak?

    Are they that much bigger than him to "enforce their wills" on him?

    Who has the most power between the three?
     
  2. Loewe

    Loewe internet hero Full Member

    5,479
    12
    Jul 15, 2008
    They are much bigger than him but not by much. I haven´t seen enough of Foster or Tunney to make a prediction but I think it would be a beutiful chess match.
    Foster - Schmeling I think could be a real classic stylewise, I´d lean towards Schmeling but I´m very biased in here since Max is an idol of mine, so I think some more objective and knowledgable should answer this one.
     
  3. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,664
    28,979
    Jun 2, 2006
    Tunney outpoints Foster and Max kos him around the 8th,he hit too hard for Foster ,whose winning record against top Heavies is 0.
     
  4. Loewe

    Loewe internet hero Full Member

    5,479
    12
    Jul 15, 2008
    Hm, but both Tunney and Schmeling where lhws for large parts of their career, wouldn´t that negate their advantage a little bit? And how would a fight Tunney-Foster at lhw would work out? Different?
     
  5. abraq

    abraq Active Member Full Member

    1,376
    19
    Sep 17, 2007
    If I recall correctly, Doug Jones was also a LHW before growing into a 'small HW'. Yet, he had little trouble beating Foster.

    Tunney & Schmeling, both better than Jones, would have no trouble beating Bob Foster at all.

    As far as power is concerned, I feel that overall Schmeling had the best power of the three. Of course, as a LHW Bob Foster was a law into himself when it came to the matter of power.