Bob Foster vs Joe Calzaghe At LHW

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by sas6789, Feb 16, 2013.


  1. thistle1

    thistle1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,915
    151
    Jul 30, 2006
    this is one of the biggest problems of the last 25 years... SO _UCKEN WHAT.

    it's Who you fought, WHEN you fought (and fought them), how MANY Fights you fought and so on.

    the more of all of the above the MORE GREAT Losses your going to have, Great Losses because your opponents were Great and Excellent fighters!!!
     
  2. BoxingFanPhil

    BoxingFanPhil Member Full Member

    330
    2
    Jan 29, 2013
    I don't think there is any reason at all to disrespect either fight here - and some disrespectful things have been said. I happen to like Calzaghe, I admire his skill, his technique, his courage - he had fast hands and the Jeff Lacy fight was a master class in many ways.

    Even as a fan of Calzaghe, I have to accept that he chose his fights carefully to maintain that record, and he was guilty of cherry picking towards the end.

    Calzaghe was not a knock out merchant, and particularly at the heavier weight, he didn't carry that power.

    If Bob Foster had a fighter in a mess like Jeff Lacy, he'd finish the job.

    So I look at what's on offer here, and either Calzaghe fights a canny game, really carefully, to a points victory, or Bob Foster takes the bout by a knock out, or TKO.

    What I've seen of Bob Foster make me suspect that he would be too much for Calzaghe. I just can't see Joe Calzaghe winning this one... I'm like 4/5 sure that Foster would take his, and there is that 1/5 chance that Joe might do something.
     
  3. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    65
    Dec 1, 2008
    Having most fighters have to fight Foster is unfair. Foster would knock out Calzaghe, or Jones Virgil Hill. Maybe Michael Spinks could give him a good fight. A great fight would have been Qawi vs. Foster. The high difference would be something like 9 inches. It is no insult on Calzaghe he lose to Foster. Most guys would.. Just such a big tall leveraged guy.
     
  4. ron u.k.

    ron u.k. Boxing Addict banned

    4,920
    12
    Feb 14, 2006
    I like Calzaghe but Foster annihalates him. Sorry.
     
  5. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,469
    Sep 7, 2008
    Calzaghe, even with his engine and jazzy awkwardness, would get timed and laid out. He'd do well to do as well as Finnegan IMO.
     
  6. ron u.k.

    ron u.k. Boxing Addict banned

    4,920
    12
    Feb 14, 2006
    Yea he lost some fights, to Ali and Frazier.
     
  7. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    26,983
    18,030
    Apr 3, 2012
    ^And those other ones too.
     
  8. Brighton bomber

    Brighton bomber Loyal Member Full Member

    31,329
    29,537
    Apr 4, 2005
    Calzaghe will struggle to outbox the much taller and rangier Foster so I see him being forced to fight more aggressively, moving forward and trying to get close enough to land, which I think he is good enough to to.

    Calzaghe's speed, agility and workrate will give Foster problems. But Calzaghe had a tendency to stay in the pocket for too long and against a puncher of Fosters caliber, that's suicide.

    I wouldn't pick many boxers to able to KO Calzaghe but Foster would be one of them. I think Calzaghe will be up on the score cards but at some point he'll leave himself open as he was never a defensive wizard and will get caught and stopped.
     
  9. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    26,983
    18,030
    Apr 3, 2012
    Okay, "garbage" was a harsh term, but someone accused me of being a troll. Dick Tiger was good. Other than that, he had a limited resume and I'm well aware of who Mike Quarry was.
     
  10. lora

    lora Fighting Zapata Full Member

    10,305
    546
    Feb 17, 2010
    He might have a limited record if we compare him to Charles or Moore, but this is Joe ****in calzaghe we're talking about.

    Robin Reid was one of his best wins.That says it all.
     
  11. rusak

    rusak Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,276
    30
    Sep 28, 2012
    This guy is a comedian.

    www.youtube.com/watch?v=[yt]qbD0g3b3VDc[/yt]
     
  12. santiagoraga

    santiagoraga Your Parents Sucked Full Member

    1,785
    1
    May 14, 2012
    I don't see Calzaghe handling Foster's length and power very well. And when it went to the inside Foster's right uppercut/left hook combo would end him.
     
  13. rusak

    rusak Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,276
    30
    Sep 28, 2012
    What I'd like to know is why you continually engage in intellectual dishonesty. You want to put a past prime Calzaghe with bad hands against prime Foster on the basis of nothing at all. Calzaghe's ring weight at 168 is about the same as Foster's at 175. Calzaghe definitely isn't smaller than a guy like Finnegan, who went 14 rounds with Foster.

    When people hype up Foster's power, they tend to ignore the fact that most of his LHW opponents would be SMWs today. Modern LWHs are bigger. They also ignore the spectacular amount of bums that Foster fought, thus inflating his KO ratio.
     
  14. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,560
    Jul 28, 2004
    He's doing nothing of the kind...Calzaghe was a fine fighter..extremely underrated, but match him up at his very best, as orriray59 has already allowed, and he still loses by ko.
    The mere fact that you try to underplay Foster's well documented power shows you to be a troll's troll. You obviously don't know what the **** you're babbling on about.
     
  15. Shake

    Shake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,633
    58
    May 4, 2007
    I said recently that you have to seperate Calzaghe from his senses to beat him. Foster is one of the prime candidates to do just that. Calzaghe with his workrate, willingness to let his hands go and good chin will give Foster opportunities to land. And, uhm, the man hit like a freakin' freight train.