Absolutely... although I'm not so sure Monzon's relatively slow one-two would be such a controlling factor. He would have to try to catch Burley mid-leap. However, I would add or repeat that Monzon was extremely good at imposing his will and controlling the tempo of the fight... his pressure was as psychological as it was physical. Though Bivins brings different things than Monzon. I'll discuss # 2 first. ... Billy Smith was a larger man. Archie Moore. He iced Elmer Ray who was a HW, in sparring, and he did the same to JD Turner who was 220 and 6'3... Against Marshall he was essentially a one-handed fighter -he reportedely had to ice his thumb right before fight time to keep the swelling down. Burley made no excuses though... and Marshall was able to catch him going away and coming in... I'm not so sure that Carlos would though. As for #1... yes, you make a good argument in support of Monzon's range finding and distance negotiations... my retort is already noted more or less, namely that Burley was never long in any range. He fought like a jumping jack -springing in and out with speed and power. Do you see the possibility that this style, considering the talent and the supreme skill behind it, may be the foil for Monzon's style? You have a compelling argument. I like mine better, but I'm not as sure as I originally was!
It's a nice post overall, i'll just make a couple of points (can't help it). Burley did have trouble with the hand before Marshall. But Marshall brought a very very aggressive game plan and had Burley on his ass in the very first round. I'm not sure Burley is up to this sort of aggression where a naturally bigger, world class man is concerned is my point. It's true he wore a handicap throughout, but some sources have Burley winning not a round in this fight. I wonder. Smith was a top, top drawer LHW, but he wasn't in Marshall's class, and certainly wasn't in Monzon's. But all you've said is basically fair.
Burley was also by his own admission "exhausted" when he signed to face Marshall. He faced Lloyd in December of 1942. It was his 17th fight that year and among his opponents were Holman Williams whom he fought 4 times, JD Turner, Shorty Hogue, and Ezzard Charles (2x). Marshall had him down twice and on rubber legs about three times -in rounds 2 and 3. Ken Overlin, who Lloyd beat in 38, said that Lloyd was the greatest fighter he ever faced. Too bad that Marshall's career is tough to assess because of his connections. PS/ Oakland Billy Smith was a bit nutty. He took a beating against Moore and then actually turned around mid-fight, climbed out of the ring, and went home!
Just say it. I think the lurch to the UK late on was a "freedom" rally, but it was to late for him. Yeah! Whilst we're swapping weird stories where Burley's opponents are concerned, did you hear the details of the death of Battling Blackjack. Weighing around 180, he is one of the bigger guys Burley fought, and he KO'd him. Blackjack later shot his wife, and was gassed, bless him. Went to the chamber in wearing all his gear, shorts, gloves, robe, they wouldn't let him wear the mouthpeice for some reason. That guy was less than right too, I think.
I knew that he got the gas chamber in Arizona for killing his wife, but didn't know that he went out in his boxing gear. Funny, I understand it. You got to be deal with that without relieving yourself in your pants, so he donned his gear and went into the tank against the undefeated Grim Reaper. God Bless him.
Excellent thread, Burley is 1 of my faves, I've only been aware of him the last 2-3years but the more I've found out and seen of him the more I have to say he is 1 of the best of all time. Whats the highest conceivable P4P spot Burley could be given. Could you play devils advocate and rate him over SRR? His wins over Moore/WIlliams may well trump any of SRRs wins and the Williams series is probably on par with the Lamotta series. For all the P4P talk, Robinson may have been a little better BUT not by much at all and Burley barely makes the top30 in most P4P lists, criminal
The problem you have for putting him in over Robinson is not so much his wins, but his losses. Those losses came against guys Robinson probably never would have got in with for the most part - Williams, Marshall, Charles - but to find your way above Robinson you have to find your way into the top five, and he does have some awkward losses against guys like Dolan and Leto, around peak. It's also the case that he doesn't have as many great fighters on his ledger as Greb, Langford, Armstrong and Robinson, who I consider to be the elite. The great skills he shows on the film aren't enough to close the gap. I had him at 11 for a while, he now sits at 13. TBooze had him at #2 for quite some time (Where is TBooze?).