I think Bobby Czyz would prevail by virtue of his proven abilities at a higher weight as well as his toughness and persistence.. Czyz was a bull of a fighter.. smart man too
Bobby Czyz was better. I was looking forward to Hearns vs Czyz at 190lbs but it never happend. After Hearns went life and death vs Freddy Delgado somebody must have decided it wasn't such a great idea.
Im kinda blessed....back on a saturday afternoon in 1987 this 11 year old kid already wide eyed with america....and in this instance the American fight scene got to see a half hour hbo special on cyzyz....than i saw back to back his title defences .....he looked exciting....different...a bull with finesse..good looking well spoken...hbo"s hype did such a wonder on my imagination i felt this kid was like a LH tyson!!!!!!! 3-4 months later i watchee him floor prince charles twice in round 2...to say i was shocked at what happened the rest of the fight is an understatement.than i see he loses to our dennis,andries...wtf...by time i saw him with hill i thought he looks,a,blunt pencil likes hes shot....i didnt realise hill and ,williams and a emannuel steward reconstructed Andries were very very good LH"s ...2 reigned for like 10 and 6 years respectively other was 3 time back when it meant a little...and cyzyz,was just a shade less....though a good marquee alphabet champ of the mid to late 1980s. Lacey also found his,level vs lacey and taylor and a shot jones albeit jones is,an atg top tier lh imo. Lacey better managed was no joke. Bobby beats him on points,over 10
