Well I don't like czyz over to many middles even. Nor over too many lh. Rossman's jab scores the points & then we get to hear the Czyz excuses for the loss. How about ring lights were too bright and bothered my vision so I really could not see his punches. If we fight where normal ring lights are used, I beat this guy easy.
I remember that about Czyz.. Insulting Roldan before his fight with Williams on the undercard of Hearns vs. Roldan for Tommy's 4th title. Saying he would never quit because of a swollen eye. Then he quits against Williams because of a swollen eye. He was a complainer. He was an ok fighter, but nothing great. A little too open. Hit harder than his record showed.
Both men are total nut jobs but I feel Czyz was much mire talented and would beat Mike up .. Mike was really nt championship caliber in my opinion. He caught Galindez on the right night but other than that really was a fringe contender at best ..
The sharp, smart, composed Rossman of the first Galindez bout would have chopped up the little overrated runt Czyz and would have had one of his better fights IMO.
The first Galindez fight wasn't Rossman's only great performance btw. He was also class in dismantling Mike Quarry. That version also batters Czyz.
Exactly, you beat me to it.. Rossman is another of those guys who gets sold just a wee bit short on here....a victim of herd mentality. Sure Galindez avenged himself...there's no reason to be ashamed of losing to a great fighter like Galindez...but there were other guys that Rossman performed well against...and he wasn't as abysmally bad as some posters make him out to be.
