Borenard And Wlad: The Double standard

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Brendan, Jun 22, 2009.


  1. Lacyace

    Lacyace Forever Knight Full Member

    3,170
    3
    Nov 6, 2005
    Maybe because Wlad's a heavyweight and generally people like to see heavyweights slug it out more so than boxers in the lower divisions.
     
  2. Pound4poundx

    Pound4poundx Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,292
    0
    Mar 25, 2008
    I really hope that you are joking!
     
  3. Windigo

    Windigo Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,131
    3
    Jun 22, 2009
    Who says he gets a freepass Nard is boring as hell.
     
  4. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,540
    16,025
    Jul 19, 2004
    More or less.

    :good
     
  5. Rudyard

    Rudyard **** How You Feel!! HOE! banned

    27,672
    1
    Jan 30, 2009
    **** poor, shitty thread!:verysad

    You fail...How can you compare a guy that is in his prime to a 43 year old fighter???:huh

    Jesus...You guys come up with some of the dumbest threads ever.
     
  6. Brendan

    Brendan Active Member Full Member

    933
    0
    Jun 5, 2007
    No, I'm not. I've watched just about every fight he's had on tv. Sure, he was capable of letting loose on weaker opponents, but recall him grabbing, holding, and rabbit punching all throughout his career. I just don't enjoy watching his fights -- never have.
     
  7. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    Yeah, like the way Borenard defeated Calzaghe with that technical savvy, oh wait that's right, Bernie lost to Joe. :D
     
  8. 196osh

    196osh Mendes Bros. Full Member

    14,565
    11
    May 10, 2007
    :lol:

    vs Wright he was 42 years old.
    Taylor tight at the weight.
    Allen what one are you are chatting about?
    Him beating **** out of Joppy was boring....
    Vanderpool wasn;'t.

    Don't remember the rest of them.

    You are blatently just being a ****.
     
  9. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    It wasn't a stupid thread. It just happens to **** off all the Wlad haters to be called out on it. Nice job BTW. :good
     
  10. Lacyace

    Lacyace Forever Knight Full Member

    3,170
    3
    Nov 6, 2005
    Or like Tarver and Pavlik?
     
  11. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,540
    16,025
    Jul 19, 2004
    Not on my scorecard.

    :smoke
     
  12. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,540
    16,025
    Jul 19, 2004
    I'm in no way a Wlad hater (read my latest article if you need "proof"), but I find Hopkins much more entertaining to watch than Wlad.

    I enjoy tactical prowess and technical genius, and I even give Wlad some credit on this front, but Hopkins is a lot more versatile and adaptable than Wlad is, IMHO.
     
  13. Brendan

    Brendan Active Member Full Member

    933
    0
    Jun 5, 2007
    You're an obvious Borenard fan. Borenard was always boring for the most part. Sure, the Trinidad fight was fun to watch, but man, fights like the Eastman fight, Wright, Taylor, Allen, Joppy ect.-- boring.
     
  14. Sheikh

    Sheikh Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,980
    886
    Jun 4, 2007
    hops is one of the most boring fighters of all time. good, but boring as hell. at least vlad ko's his opponents unlike borenard
     
  15. Brendan

    Brendan Active Member Full Member

    933
    0
    Jun 5, 2007
    Yes, I think I channeled the Klitschko hate crew with this one.. haha.