Box Rec fighter rankings WTF...

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by BrummyLad, Nov 17, 2010.


  1. BrummyLad

    BrummyLad Sergio Kun Aguero Full Member

    2,197
    0
    Nov 19, 2009
    Seriously tho wtf, I have just had a gander at the homepage and they have Andre Ward at smw best fighter at weight yet they have Andre Dirrell at no11 p4p and Ward No12.

    What possible reason can they have for those rankings, Dirrell only win 1 of his last 2 and Ward wins his last 2 and is wba champ. Surely its teh other way round :patsch

    Thoughts
     
  2. LP_1985

    LP_1985 JMM beat Pac-Man 3 Times Full Member

    30,096
    1
    Sep 6, 2009
    boxrec is a complete joke when it comes to rankings, its done on some point systym

    dont worry bout it
     
  3. Bad Dog

    Bad Dog Boxing Addict banned

    5,986
    1
    May 16, 2010
    Take a deep breath and relax. Everyone knows it is based on some bull**** point scoring system.

    Happy?
     
  4. doug.ie

    doug.ie 'Classic Boxing Society' Full Member

    14,214
    80
    Apr 1, 2008
    why take boxrec rankings so serious ?...they're not meaningful
     
  5. GreyWolf

    GreyWolf Guest

    LOL @ Anyone who takes BOXREC'S rankings seriously
     
  6. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    42
    Jan 7, 2005
    The Boxrec rankings are maths based and always throw up lots of weird rankings.
     
  7. Kelly green

    Kelly green Active Member Full Member

    1,165
    0
    Jan 19, 2010
    Id follow boxrec rankings and IBO rankings before i would look at the main four belt rankings thats for sure.

    Most of you cats would cry for days on end if Boxrecs rankings and schedule cease to exist.
     
  8. bruthead

    bruthead REAL TALK Full Member

    2,308
    1
    May 3, 2009
    :deal

    Boxrec's ranking formula is imperfect but it's not bad. They could do with changing a few aspects of the formula it but if you want to get pissed off about rankings, look at the WBA, WBC or IBF first.
     
  9. Scotty321

    Scotty321 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,516
    0
    Dec 21, 2008
    I'm baffled by their points system. In the last 2 years, Hopkins has beat Ornelas and Jones Jr yet is P4P no.4.
     
  10. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    42
    Jan 7, 2005
    Schedule? yes. Rankings? Not in the slightest.
     
  11. roe

    roe Guest

    Their rankings aren't that bad. As said before they're still probably the best out there. There are one or two problems that occur when boxers switch weight divisions and some of the ratings are a little strange.

    If we never had BoxRec's ratings, we'd never have known that Haye and Vitali have recently fought guys ranked about 45th in the world!
     
  12. Bajingo

    Bajingo Boxing Junkie banned

    14,050
    0
    Nov 15, 2009
    If you believe Boxrec rankings then Sergei Dzinziruk (the best jr middleweight around) is a journeyman.
     
  13. DamonD

    DamonD Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,285
    41
    Nov 19, 2004
    Sometimes they work, sometimes they don't. I've never understood the 'THEY'RE ALL RUBBISH!!' attitude.
     
  14. WesT

    WesT Boxing Addict banned

    5,772
    0
    May 13, 2009
    They have Bute ranked #1 at SMW , not Ward ...same as The Ring Magazine.

    This content is protected




    And they have Ward #22 P4P

    [url]http://boxrec.com/ratings.php?country=&sex=m&division=P4P&status=A&SUBMIT=Go[/url]
     
  15. PaddyD1983

    PaddyD1983 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,919
    2
    Dec 24, 2007
    Boxrec is an absolultely fantastic tool for research, fixtures, results and boxers records. A few decent articles now and again, but their rankings are only good for being comprehensive. They certainly are nowhere near accurate. Having said that though, whose are?!