Boxers have regressed a lot

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by bballchump11, Aug 28, 2012.


  1. FelixTrinidad

    FelixTrinidad Boxing Addict banned

    4,735
    2
    Jun 15, 2012
    Prove to me why Lewis and Wlad's physical aspects does not equal the perfect boxing body?

    That was the entire 2nd half of my point. The perfect fighting machine is

    6'5'-6'6, fast, powerful, great jab, great power, able to fight on the inside, great foot work, strength, agility,flash.

    What's your perfect fighting body? 6'3 Ali? Why be 6'3 if you can be 6'5-6'6 but also keep your speed, reflexes, except with MUCH more power and greater strength?
     
  2. SJS19

    SJS19 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,479
    14
    Jun 13, 2011
    You've missed the entire point of the thread you ******. :roll:

    Bet you're Doctor Larry too.
     
  3. FelixTrinidad

    FelixTrinidad Boxing Addict banned

    4,735
    2
    Jun 15, 2012
    I was getting to the 2nd part before I was rudely interrupted.

    I get what bballerchuarpion or whatever his name is, I get what he's trying to say. But he generalized way too much, the 90's is a modern era that produced Floyd Mayweather, Lennox Lewis, Pernell Whitaker, Felix Trinidad, Oscar De La Hoya, Roy Jones Jr, Bernard Hopkins.

    they are inferior to Joe Louis, Jack Johnson, Roberto Duran, Aaron Pryor, how?
    If they are indeed inferior, it can't be by much. Let me ask this question:how many of you guys even WATCHED the 2nd teir guys of the 60's and the 70's and the 80's fight?

    You guys watch the FAB Four in your little basements, THEN watch Victor Ortiz, and nod your heads and say **** like 'Yep Yep, BBALLERCHAMP sure is smart, it ain't like the good ole days'.

    Have any of you SEEN the Victor Ortiz of the 80's? Do you want me to link the 'victor' of the 80's? Do you guys want me to link the Derek Chisora of the 60's? They are no better and no worst then the Chisoras and Ortizez of the modern era.
     
  4. SJS19

    SJS19 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,479
    14
    Jun 13, 2011
    You're still missing the point you idiot :lol:

    Later, I will explain.
     
  5. FelixTrinidad

    FelixTrinidad Boxing Addict banned

    4,735
    2
    Jun 15, 2012
    EXPLAIN SOON. :fire:fire
     
  6. RobertV77

    RobertV77 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,001
    4
    Apr 7, 2010

    Yours is a great list. Their are many dozens more from tougher eras that are as good as these fighters. If your think we are in one of boxing's better era's your insane.
     
  7. RobertV77

    RobertV77 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,001
    4
    Apr 7, 2010

    Wow, you are taking a lot of strange leaps. Some fixed fights does not invalidate all fights prior to 1980 anymore than corruption and fixed fights invalidates boxing completely today. As for your Victor Conte comment how could we possibly know? It's hard to maintain a commentary on this topic with 3/4's of the participants being little more than fan boys but huirt over the notion their favorite fighters are not the all time great.
     
  8. general zod

    general zod World Champion Full Member

    6,744
    51
    Apr 7, 2010
    I would argue that there has always been a percentage of boxers who were complete all round fighters, while the rest have been a step below them. What should of happened is that the percentage should of increased due to fight footage and those formers fighters becoming trainers, but that has not happened for whatever reason.
     
  9. Ripper11

    Ripper11 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,475
    2
    Apr 21, 2011
  10. Bobo

    Bobo Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,050
    5
    Feb 20, 2011
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wo9zzGccQ0o&feature=g-vrec[/ame]

    fight between Curtis Cokes and Stanley Hayward. Cokes was 34-6-2 and Hayward was 18-2-1 if boxrec is right. you don't even see the elites of today doing it like this. just the way these guys move. today's fighters don't have these techniques! and this is just a random fight i chose. this is a great fight by the way.
     
  11. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    23
    Oct 27, 2010
    dang thanks for this :good
     
  12. KnuckleUp99

    KnuckleUp99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,055
    1
    Jan 15, 2011
    100%! Couldn't agree with you more on this topic.
     
  13. techks

    techks ATG list Killah! Full Member

    19,779
    701
    Dec 6, 2009
    Technique has regressed but medicines,vitamins, athleticism for the most part(basically physical have progressed). In modern boxing, most young guys don't have that savy and kraftiness no more. I mean, guys are praising Maidana just for jabbing? I thought every fighter was suppose to know what a jab was! "Technique" is some trash now for the most part! Than can apply to the era but I don't feel like going deep into that now.

    Great part about feinting too. Incredibly difficult to name young fighters who do that. Donaire? Rigo? Alvarez?



    Pride of the youth I guess. Guys don't wanna listen and idiotically assume they are good enough as guys now are more athletic and have better ways to deal with health. But what hapens when that athleticism fades? Might wanna pop in some Duran dvds to see how one can age gracefully in the ring for instance.(5 decades? Who'll do that now?)

    I think quite highly of Olivares, Tunney, Johnson, Marciano,etc. for example. Great technicians of the past.
     
  14. haworths623

    haworths623 Guest


    You've got to admit though, Sugar Ray Robinson tastes defeat against Magic Matthew Hatton-

    http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=430824
     
  15. megavolt

    megavolt Constantly Shadowboxing Full Member

    13,622
    34
    Dec 25, 2009
    Don't even.

    Barrera-Morales I.