Boxers have regressed a lot

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by bballchump11, Aug 28, 2012.


  1. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,008
    48,103
    Mar 21, 2007
    Perhaps you could list what would be an acceptable source?
     
  2. rayrobinson

    rayrobinson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,656
    706
    Dec 8, 2009
    Dont bother asking him McGrain, he doesnt know boxing.
     
  3. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,008
    48,103
    Mar 21, 2007
    I'm interested to know though.
     
  4. dealt_with

    dealt_with Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,931
    1,230
    Apr 27, 2012
    I've already mentioned what a reliable source is... look a couple of posts back.

    .. a reputable statistic record keeping organisation that anybody can look at
     
  5. dealt_with

    dealt_with Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,931
    1,230
    Apr 27, 2012
    You base this on...?
     
  6. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,008
    48,103
    Mar 21, 2007
    "...a reputable statistic record keeping organisation."

    Like what?
     
  7. rayrobinson

    rayrobinson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,656
    706
    Dec 8, 2009
    Everyone of your posts.
     
  8. SJS19

    SJS19 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,479
    14
    Jun 13, 2011
    :yep
     
  9. dealt_with

    dealt_with Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,931
    1,230
    Apr 27, 2012
    Exactly. Where did your book and your newspaper get these records from? If they can't provide that, and if nobody can publicly look at the information then their source might actually be their Uncle Sue.
     
  10. dealt_with

    dealt_with Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,931
    1,230
    Apr 27, 2012
    :lol: Wow you showed me. Please tell me how I can be as knowledgable about boxing as you?
     
  11. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,008
    48,103
    Mar 21, 2007
    Sure, but these are respected sources. All three of the sources i've listed have reputations that are mostly in tact.

    I'm sure your Uncle Sue is respectable too, but it's unlikely that The Observer on Sunday would have asked him/her for an opinion.

    You've said you regard ONLY "a reputable statistic record keeping organisations" as acceptable sources, nothing else matters.

    I'm asking you what would be a good example of "a reputable statistic record keeping organisation"? Can you give me an example?
     
  12. rayrobinson

    rayrobinson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,656
    706
    Dec 8, 2009
    Firstly stop posting.
     
  13. dealt_with

    dealt_with Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,931
    1,230
    Apr 27, 2012
    It's not up to me to give an example, I don't know if there is anybody tracking these things. If there are no statistics being kept then nobody knows. If the newspaper has a source then they have to show it. A newspaper isn't a source, it reports a source. Until you can tell me the source that they're using then it's Uncle Sue's word versus my Aunt Tom's word.
    You don't seem to be following the logic very well..
     
  14. dealt_with

    dealt_with Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,931
    1,230
    Apr 27, 2012
    Deal. If you stop breathing first :good
     
  15. Bogotazo

    Bogotazo Amateur Full Member

    31,381
    1,133
    Oct 17, 2009
    The top couple of beltholders in each division are well rounded, but I think it's fair to say the norm is that those that fall below that tier are far less complete.