I see alot of bashing when it comes to fighters like Maidana, Angulo, Margarito and fighters of their style, being called flat footed "tomato cans" or "all they are is workhorses w a chin","they posses no talent" and then go on about how great and beautiful "talented" some boxers are, or what "wizards they are":rofl So if 2 Cards were put together w "wizards" and "cans" where would you spend your hard earned $? (a ringside seat, at one set price) Card 1 Arreola vs. ...... Angulo vs. ..... Kirkland vs. ...... Maidana vs. ........ Card 2 $May vs. .......... Ward(SOG) vs. ....... Haye vs. .......... Hopkins vs. .........
Wizards shine their brightest when it comes time to handle "cans". My favorite type of fights are: Mayweather-Hatton Hopkins-Trinidad Whitaker-Chavez
"A stupid fighter is the hardest type of fighter to fight. YOu can throw a feint, and he won't know what it is." - The Great Wizard Benny Leonard
They do. But I am a fan of the "cans" and frustrated when I watch those fights, I remember yelling at the TV watching mosley just shuffling his fuken gloves the whole fight after round 3 w/out throwing a damn punch!
So if you had the chance to go back in time and watch a fight and the choices were Chavez vs Whittaker or Hagler vs Hearns(the brawled it out)? which one would you choose?
Hagler vs. Hearns was a big event and just a huge fight. It depends on the fight. I would not take Whittaker vs. Chavez over Hagler vs. Hearns, but I would take Whittaker vs. Chavez over Brewster vs. Liakovich.
Card 2. Those athletes display technique, poise, and experience. If I wanted to see fighters like Margarito, I would go to an American bar on a Saturday night.
I guess everyone just has their taste just like they do women, some people like the chubbys and some like the slenders.