Boxing: A Tale of HBO Nuthuggery...case for bradley winning ????

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by highguard, Jul 12, 2012.


  1. highguard

    highguard Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,791
    6
    Apr 12, 2010
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=riSEb-hdq8M&feature=player_embedded[/ame]


    very good video
     
  2. TheGreat

    TheGreat Boxing Junkie banned

    13,028
    14
    Jan 12, 2005
    This came from a Pac fan who had Pac winning a close fight, he has also exposed their nuthuggery towards other hbo house-fighters including Mayweather. Jim "bang bang" Lampley is a disgraceful cheerleader.
     
  3. Ripple633

    Ripple633 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,635
    1
    Jun 2, 2009

    Exactly in the third round in the 2:22 mark, the left hand did not land, and in the 0:37 mark those two lefts that Pacquiao threw did not land. So the third round possibly could have went to Bradley. I gave the third round to Bradley.

    Also in the 6th round around the 0:25 second mark, Bradley lands two body shots, an uppercut, and a counter-left hook (all clean shots), yet none of the HBO announcers never gave any credit to Bradley which were all scoring blows. I score the 6th round a draw.

    BTW Bradley's body work was phenomenal in that fight. You can tell Bradley's body work was having an effect on Pacquiao because by the 12th round Pacquiao looked gassed, and was getting hit often. Yet that dumb ass Howard Letterman gave the 12th round to Pacquiao. Is he ****ing blind?
     
  4. Boxing Fanatic

    Boxing Fanatic Loyal Member banned

    48,204
    9
    Sep 16, 2008
    u guys r pathetic. i cant believe u call yourselves boxing fans. laughable
     
  5. megavolt

    megavolt Constantly Shadowboxing Full Member

    13,622
    34
    Dec 25, 2009
    please man, the first argument of that clip (still frame) is as bad an argument as the "watch slomo" for the Marquez fight
     
  6. highguard

    highguard Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,791
    6
    Apr 12, 2010
    i think the guy who did the video

    did a wonderful job
    and you can see excatly what he is trying to say
     
  7. raheen

    raheen Member Full Member

    204
    0
    Sep 18, 2009
    Agree with the HBO nuthuggery thing, but why did every other expert at ringside have Pacquiao up by a considerable margin except Brian Kenny and Thomas Hauser. They were not watching HBO, and they watched the fight live Ringside without being biased. Anybody who thinks Bradley won that fight is blind.
     
  8. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,405
    11,431
    Jan 6, 2007



    You pair of fools remind me of the cops' lawyers who broke down the Rodney King video for that assault trial jury.



    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SW1ZDIXiuS4[/ame]



    They managed to convince the jury there was no assault, and get all those cops acquitted, too !:yep





    For the sake of the blind, I can report that Timothy was physically abused by Pac and if that **** had gone down outside the ring, Manny would need those LA lawyers. :lol:
     
  9. LikeFatherNSon

    LikeFatherNSon Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,004
    4
    Jun 21, 2012
    It's the herd mentality you see in press row. It's not surprising that there cards all read very similar too. People just are mesmerized by superstars and powerpunches. Manny lands a couple lefts and there aren't just any old lefts, they're "big lefts!" that win him a round where he throws a few punches. That's just the way it goes.
     
  10. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    I think it was Bradley's body language during the fight.
    For great chunks of the fight, even though Pacquiao was missing with most of what he was dishing out, Bradley's body language told a story of being uncomfortable where he was at.

    That, and like I did, alot of the more respected boxing journalist had Pacquiao winning but alot closer than the fight HBO depicted.

    The bottom line is that neither fighter landed much of what is called clean and effective punches. When this happens the name fighter will 99 times out of 100 get the benefit not only from the judges, but those boxing journalist sitting at ringside as well.

    Why the official judges did'nt give it to Pacquiao is a complicted scenario, but I think its easy to see why most at ringside scored for Pacquiao, though alot had it alot closer than what was depicted on the air by the nuthugging team at HBO!