Andrade: The 168 version of Antonio Margarito, this m--f--ka can not be stopped and he hits hard. I said this before the fight, but all the Bute nuthuggers said their man would win easily. He also has a heart of gold and shows great sportsmanship. Bute: Slick boxer, Canadian, nuthugger fans, you've heard it all before. This man is a great Canadian but he was given bad corner advice, slug it out in round 12 with Andrade. Good luck to him, I am not sure how much he knew about the dodgy referee, but at a minimum he needs to give Andrade a rematch. However the refereee might have actually runied this guy's career by not defending him when he was getting hit by a monster. Corruption: This sport is run by a lot of bad people. Bute may have got up within 10 seconds of hitting the ground and Andrade may not have been snuggled in the neutral "corner", but Bute was cooked and the referee clearly did everything possible to help Bute. What can we the people do? Protest against this **** by not watching bull**** matches set-up by greedy scumbags.
They`ll be a rematch. The result will probably be the same.. Andrade was being out boxed. Unfortunately he at the very wrong end of a bad count.
What does any of this have to do with Bute, Andrade or the IBF? None of them had something to do with the referee's actions during the fight.
Anybody who gets dominated for 11 rounds and KDs the other guy in the last second deserves a rematch,it would sell,make money and it's a good fight.
Oh, so now Andrade was dominated as well? Not, that it helps your argument. Maybe you should take off your Bute glasses?
:rofl:rofl - it would never end the debate of the first fight. Unless the laws of karma really do exist :rofl.
Yes,you are right,Andrade was dominating,he won 10 rounds at least.Bute only won 1 round max.I don't know how anybody had Bute ahead on pointsatsch atsch atsch :-( :-( :-(